fmbb

12 ms·

181.
by fmbb 1y ago
They could train them to not behave like person having a dialog at all, but just like a weird search. It would not be hard, would it? They are designed like this on purpose for some reason. I would guess because it increases engagement.
182.
by fmbb 1y ago
All living things have means and ends and pursue goals to completion. That does not make us call them intelligent. Whenever the LLM fails to act intelligently, we blame the person who gave it the task. So we don't expect them to be abl
183.
by fmbb 1y ago
Does that mean you just don’t believe we will make AGI, or it will arrive but then stop and never evolve past humans? That’s not what the AI developers profess to believe, or the investors.
184.
by fmbb 1y ago
> It’s because the bottleneck isn’t in intelligence, but in human tasks: specifying intent and context engineering. So the bottleneck is intelligence. Junior engineers are intelligent enough to understand when they don't understand.
185.
by fmbb 1y ago
> Throughout this process society becomes wealthier, TVs get cheaper, we colonize Mars, etc. The force that keeps this going is human insatisfaction: once we get these things we’ll want whatever it is we don’t have. What makes you think
186.
by fmbb 1y ago
Doesn’t the official docker build push action support caching with the GitHub Actions cache?
187.
by fmbb 1y ago
Anthropic sells this thing called Claude Code, but their customers have to train it to know how to be a programmer? Junior developers not even out of school don’t need to be instructed to think.
188.
by fmbb 1y ago
People also complained a lot about VR. And NFTs had a lot of loud detractors. And everyone complained about a million other solutions that did not go anywhere. Still, a bunch of investors made a lot of money on VR and very much so on NFT. I
189.
by fmbb 1y ago
Of course you can automate ”having fun” and ”being entertained”. That is if you believe humanity will ever build artificial intelligence.
190.
by fmbb 1y ago
It is the British monarchy that is performative, not their democracy.
191.
by fmbb 1y ago
Also, if you are a developer by trade a lot of these features are quick and easy to implement.
192.
by fmbb 1y ago
Ever since shellcheck came around I have been writing all my scripts in POSIX sh. Its not that bad actually and knowing stuff is just more compatible is worth that little friction.
193.
by fmbb 1y ago
Web 2.0 was also hot.
194.
by fmbb 1y ago
It’s way too dark for this time of year at this time of day here at 60 degrees north. But it looked very cool earlier today when it matched!
195.
by fmbb 1y ago
We already have README, and API specs, and Jira, and Confluence, and RFCs are freely available. Why do these "agents" need so much hand holding?
196.
by fmbb 1y ago
In 1930 there was not enough information in the world for consciousness to develop.
197.
by fmbb 1y ago
Ah is this why ChatGPT was talking to me about `to=bio` so much yesterday, is it a new shiny thing? It almost sounded like it was bragging.
198.
by fmbb 1y ago
I mean it’s all up to the employer if they want employees to be productive. If they don’t care they don’t care. They pay most of us for our time anyway, not what we achieve.
199.
by fmbb 1y ago
That page also seems to recommend using lex and yacc, so … what are we to do with this information?
200.
by fmbb 1y ago
Win how? More efficiency will inevitably only lead to increased usage of the CPU and in turn batteries draining faster. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox
201.
by fmbb 1y ago
What’s the difference? Pushing images is a oneliner.
202.
by fmbb 1y ago
I have started to gravitate toward ”write everything 100 times” or at least ten. I’m thoroughly convinced DRY is the most ill-applied of all programming dogmas. At every place of work I have been I have run into bugs introduced by changes i
203.
by fmbb 1y ago
All successful code bases have this ”problem”. You become successful by making priorities. All parts of your product do not need to be perfect.
204.
by fmbb 1y ago
Chrome, Edge, Opera, Safari support this attribute.
205.
by fmbb 1y ago
If there are no failures how can you claim them?
206.
by fmbb 1y ago
There is nothing artificial about that. The more you annoy drivers of cars and the less efficient you make streets for car traffic and the more you force them to not trust their surroundings, the safer the streets are for everyone.
207.
by fmbb 1y ago
Are home schooled over-represented among mathematicians that solved major math mysteries? Wait that would not even prove anything. Are there no mathematicians who solved major math mysteries that went to school?
208.
by fmbb 1y ago
Nobody claimed we are intelligently designed. Evolution is not perfect. We are still better at running long distances for long stretches of time than any other animal.
209.
by fmbb 1y ago
Army personnel in general is unnaturally beefy and I'm sure these running drills often are done carrying load, no? Humans are evolved to run, but not to have heavy frames and not carrying material for fighting wars.
210.
by fmbb 1y ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox The Jevons Paradox is applicable in a lot of contexts. More efficient use of compute and communications resources will lead to higher demand. In games this is fine. We wan

More ›