flyyingbarron

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   The James Webb Space Telescope – Success Through Redundancy(flyingbarron.medium.com)

   1 points by flyyingbarron 5y ago|0 comments
2. 2.▲
   by flyyingbarron 5y ago

   Thanks. Changed that to "while staying behind the Earth"
3. 3.▲
   by flyyingbarron 5y ago

   Thanks. Changed that to "while staying behind the Earth"
4. 4.▲
   by flyyingbarron 5y ago

   Thanks. Changed that to "while staying behind the Earth"
5. 5.▲
   by flyyingbarron 5y ago

   +1 for systems engineering indeed. That's one of the reasons I write my blog - I think there are plenty of inspirational & aspirational lessons software developers (especially, but no only, in the DevOps and SRE domains) can learn
6. 6.▲
   by flyyingbarron 5y ago

   Fair enough, but I felt that detailing the contractors would lengthen the article and not add to my general points. I did mention Northrup Grumman engineers in the caption of one image.
7. 7.▲
   by flyyingbarron 5y ago

   Yes, the price error was a typo which has been fixed. "not designed in a vacuum" was a figure of speech, meaning that testing it was done in the context of previous missions.
8. 8.▲
   by flyyingbarron 5y ago

   No, it's simply a typo, missing the final ",000". It's been fixed now, thanks.
9. 9.▲
   by flyyingbarron 5y ago

   Well yes, this is an introductory article to a series of articles.
10. 10.▲
    by flyyingbarron 5y ago

    Sorry about that! The price was obviously a typo :( What other errors did you find?