Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
flippingheck
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
flippingheck
9d ago
I cannot see why this litmus test is either necessary nor sufficient for evaluating the success of LLMs.
2.
▲
by
flippingheck
9d ago
It's advantageous in rules-based systems, but many aspects of life, particularly interpersonal, are not rules-based. Systems thinking pays well, which is advantageous, but this might be short lived, now that LLMs can mediate interfacin
3.
▲
by
flippingheck
9d ago
Unconsciously masking is still tiring, and masking doesn't generalise well to unfamiliar situations.
4.
▲
by
flippingheck
9d ago
> There are two types of people: those who have suffered a catastrophic loss of data, and those who will. This is an empirical claim, but is it grounded in reality? 99% of people don't backup, and that's probably the right choi
5.
▲
by
flippingheck
10d ago
Are you sure it's not just chocolate stuck in your teeth? More seriously, that's fascinating. I don't think I experience this?
6.
▲
by
flippingheck
10d ago
Thanks, that's really handy to see. Looks cool!
7.
▲
by
flippingheck
10d ago
Ah. I read the post, but only saw "2024-07-16 04:52 ChanServ changed [...]" On mobile I didn't see the full URL, and zoomed before I saw the calendar. My bad.
8.
▲
by
flippingheck
10d ago
Isn't that chat log from 2024?
9.
▲
by
flippingheck
10d ago
> <StanfordAppliedCyber[m]> one of my friends is a very senior engineer who lead a lot of the sptm work and controls a lot of boot, may talk to him about it (obviously he hasn't told me anything that isn't public) For the
10.
▲
by
flippingheck
11d ago
Visiting 3D virtual places sounds cool. What communities do this? Can I do this on my laptop too to trial it?
11.
▲
by
flippingheck
11d ago
80% is still pretty high! Does 80% mean "tastes like a dull chocolate bar, but still basically a chocolate bar", or more like "like a nice chocolate bar but somehow 20% less enjoyable in some looser way"? Perhaps this is
12.
▲
by
flippingheck
11d ago
I have barely even considered VR until the Steam Frame. I'm just not interested in closed ecosystems like Oculus. That said, I have barely looked at VR so much that I'm not sure whether to bother with the Steam Frame. Is it just f
13.
▲
by
flippingheck
11d ago
Thanks. This was great.
14.
▲
by
flippingheck
12d ago
I'm pretty sure I have this, for all senses, and I only just learned there's things other than iñner eye (which I only learned of a few months). If people have an "inner taste" or "inner hearing", why bother ea
15.
▲
by
flippingheck
15d ago
The device is acoustic. Think of it as a babel fish for telling fire to stop.
16.
▲
by
flippingheck
15d ago
It's a big bet to not have a plan for needing power. I expect as LLMs penetrate further, we'll see much more of it, continually running, and doing more 3D work.
17.
▲
by
flippingheck
15d ago
> I need help. Call SOS on your telegraph?
18.
▲
by
flippingheck
16d ago
That is much fewer LoC than I expected. How is "offline e-reader" handled? Does CUPS retry? Do you do this outside of your LAN?
19.
▲
by
flippingheck
16d ago
> open platform like the Xteink is that it should uncover loads of novel and unsatisfied use cases +1. And it's worth celebrating the underlying technologies that enable this: ESP32, and RISC-V. Anyone know what's needed for ei
20.
▲
by
flippingheck
19d ago
I just read your original comment "is this any conceptually different from using PKCS11 provider for TPM in OpenSSL?" and yes, I agree it's not conceptually different. Sorry to have missed that!
21.
▲
by
flippingheck
19d ago
I thought you was suggesting a TPM wasn't needed at all, but a TPM is needed to get quotes. That said, TPM quotes are attesting the value of TPM PCRs which are just registers of hashes (representing the state of the machine). When maki
22.
▲
by
flippingheck
19d ago
Is this is meaningfully different than the risk to any engineer working in security on ~central infrastructure? > even if you don't have the keys you may still control the implementation The sorts of places that care about remote at
23.
▲
by
flippingheck
19d ago
> is this any conceptually different from using PKCS11 provider for TPM in OpenSSL? PKCS11 doesn't allow you to attest that the key is resident in the PKCS11 provider, which as you say, the author alludes to, but doesn't cover.
24.
▲
by
flippingheck
19d ago
Yeah, a typical TPM chip has much lower throughput than OP. Not suitable for servers, since it's such an easy DoS vector.
25.
▲
by
flippingheck
19d ago
TPM is just a spec, it isn't necessarily a black box. ARM TrustZone, for example, can run this OSS TPM: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_ftpm I expect there are equivalents for Intel/AMD.
26.
▲
by
flippingheck
19d ago
> through every scandal, Zuckerberg’s net worth has climbed to nearly $200bn, according to Forbes. Fines mean nothing to those with wealth like his, so the first step to safeguard society is to give Meta a fresh start without Zuckerberg’
27.
▲
by
flippingheck
19d ago
The greater the dependence, the greater the risk.
28.
▲
by
flippingheck
21d ago
Does that somehow also explain why many (most?) desktop users survive with just a browser? To be clear, I'm not saying it doesn't. I'm saying I don't understand.
29.
▲
by
flippingheck
21d ago
> decision we have made This might oversell the agency that practicioners have. Sandboxed zero-install delivery will outcompete anything with more frictionful installs. It's probably not the right model for a pacemaker though. Web&#