fl7305

10 ms·

31.
by fl7305 10mo ago
> See the recent deals where it’s been used as a political bargaining chip; it still ended up being a very desirable and capable platform from my understanding. From a european perspective, I can tell you that the mood has shifted 180 de
32.
by fl7305 10mo ago
> It is impossible for a simulink model to accidentally type `i > 0` when they meant `i >= 0` The Simulink Coder tool is a piece of software. It is designed and implemented by humans. It will have bugs. Autogenerated code is differ
33.
by fl7305 10mo ago
> you guidance inevitably falls out of the context window Yes, for a pure LLM session. But using GitHub Copilot, the agent server picks out what it thinks is your most important rules, and inserts them as part of the context before runni
34.
by fl7305 11mo ago
> The order defines Class M1 vehicles as “those falling within class M1(a) and class M1(b) as specified in Schedule 1 of the Vehicle Classes Regulations, which refers to another bit of UK legislation. > Oxford’s congestion charge is a
35.
by fl7305 11mo ago
In 1971 there where ships with almost twice the displacement of the Dali. They weren't freight ships destined for Baltimore, but it wasn't hard to imagine future freight ship sizes when designing the bridge in the early 1970s. The
36.
by fl7305 11mo ago
I think it would be well enough for Nethack. Would be interesting if even a Z80 could run Nethack in a CPU emulator.
37.
by fl7305 11mo ago
You could easily write a RISC-V CPU emulator for your older/smaller machines, and run the original Nethack code compiled to RISC-V.
38.
by fl7305 11mo ago
> In particular, at the time that it was written, it meant arm themselves with military weapons for the purposes of military action. That's what the contemporary use of the term "bear arms" was understood to mean. Try to f
39.
by fl7305 11mo ago
> we cannot function as a nation on the basis of, "Aw, everyone knows what they meant...". I guess that's fine when it comes to the 2nd, but not as fun when your opponents tries the same for the 14th?
40.
by fl7305 11mo ago
> Effectively no legal scholars or judges of merit support that belief And how did the "legal scholars or judges of merit" interpret the 2nd amendment in 1800? The same way as today? The constitution seems to have become a lot
41.
by fl7305 11mo ago
>> Executive orders cannot overrule the Constitution. > I would hope this is a fairly universally held position, not so partisan. I agree. I think the constitution limits both the executive and the legislative branches. > how wi
42.
by fl7305 11mo ago
Some of us are ancient enough to have been born before the last person walked on the moon.
43.
by fl7305 11mo ago
>> the presumption that reasoning skills cannot evolve > I don’t know how to address the evolve part. LLMs don’t directly mutate and have selective pressure like living organisms. Sorry, that was poorly worded. I meant "can re
44.
by fl7305 11mo ago
> LLMs don’t really reason Do you have a test for this? Or is it based on the presumption that reasoning skills cannot evolve, it can only be the result of "intelligent design"?
45.
by fl7305 1y ago
It made me want to go back and check their other press releases to see where they did not include the "consenting" part.
46.
by fl7305 1y ago
It'd be interesting to try it as a regular keyboard too. Probably a bit too imprecise even for skilled users, but who knows. And if you really get into them, maybe it's worth spending the time to learn chords instead, like for a c
47.
by fl7305 1y ago
With that logic, we should put 100.00% of all public funding into protecting us against world ending asteroids.
48.
by fl7305 1y ago
You might be right that it wasn't GCC specifically. I think I was running a free/low cost version of OS-9 68K for the Atari ST, and managed to get hold of a proprietary C compiler for it. The combination of a "real" OS +
49.
by fl7305 1y ago
Not apples to apples. Just being near a potentially aggressive bear is a bad situation. Being near a car or a nuclear power plant is not a bad siuation. Of course you should run in the other direction if you're close to a potentially a
50.
by fl7305 1y ago
By your logic, it's wrong to spend many billions per year on traffic safety. It should go into bear safety instead. "Average deaths per TWh produced" is a good yardstick to me.
51.
by fl7305 1y ago
> What Stallman did a decade later was great if you happened to have access to the type of computer that could run Emacs. Even then, you probably didn't own the machine and maybe even had to pay for time on it by the hour. The small
52.
by fl7305 1y ago
Note that the inaccuracy comes from determining where the lightning strike starting point was from the waveform shape. The raw position accuracy at 100 ns is better than 10 m.
53.
by fl7305 1y ago
The Swedish airforce doesn't have a "grouping of vehicles". They are all parked individually at separate locations kilometers away from the road landing strip. When the plane comes in for landing, they (3-5 pickup trucks and
54.
by fl7305 1y ago
> Does ChatGPT ever ask the user, like, anything? Yes. At least when I just tried ChatGPT-5: Can I replace sodium chloride with sodium bromide? ChatGPT said: Yes, in some cases — but it depends on the application. Chemistry/lab us
55.
by fl7305 1y ago
An LLM is very much like a CPU. It takes inputs and performs processing on them based on its working memory and previous inputs and outputs, and then produces a new output and updates its working memory. It then loops back to do the same th
56.
by fl7305 1y ago
Of course you can gerrymander your way to power. You can turn a fairly small minority in votes to a majority of the seats. Professor Braunschweiger explains it well in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2EnuHsRJd4
57.
by fl7305 1y ago
CFR is usually higher than TFR
58.
by fl7305 1y ago
> it [...] suggested (assertively but correctly) where the problem was > it was a decent, if probabilistic, rubber duck How is it a rubber duck if it suggested where the problem was? Isn't a rubber duck a mute object which you e
59.
by fl7305 1y ago
(non-sarcastically from me this time) Sure, I would agree with that wording. In the same way, neural networks which are trained to do a task could be said to be "designed" to do something. In my view, there's a big difference
60.
by fl7305 1y ago
> "The crazy thing is that people think that a model designed to" It's even crazier that some people believe that humans "evolved" intelligence just by nature selecting the genes which were best at propagating. C

More ›