4 ms·
(non-sarcastically from me this time) Sure, I would agree with that wording. In the same way, neural networks which are trained to do a task could be said to
by fl7305 1y ago
(non-sarcastically from me this time)
Sure, I would agree with that wording.
In the same way, neural networks which are trained to do a task could be said to be "designed" to do something.
In my view, there's a big difference in what the training data is for a neural network, and what the neural network is "designed" for.
We can train a network using word completion examples, with the intent of designing it for intelligence.
- fhd2 1y agoYup. To counter my own points a bit: I could also argue that the word "design" has a connotation strictly opposing emergent behaviour like evolution, as in the intelligent design "theory". So not the best word to use perhaps. And in your example, just because we made a system that exhibits emergent behaviour to some degree, we can't assume it can "design" intelligence the way evolution did, on a much, much shorter timeline, no less.