fkcgnad

4 ms·

1.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
I think it's just luck. In terms of big tech most of the US is like Europe. It's only silicon valley that has this type of innovation. But the innovation has been around a singular avenue of software. It is a mistake to think that
2.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
Information is an illusion. What are you going to do with pure information? Nothing. For information to be worthwhile it must be actualized into physical reality. There is huge practical evidence for this. China. The technological rise of C
3.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
Ambition has it's downsides. Risk does not always return with reward and often the reward has a high cost. Such attitudes exist for a good reason. But at the same time the alternative attitude also exists for a good reason.
4.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
They don't compete. They reap the benefits of technological innovation without the need to push their own citizens to do the same. It's a smart strategy. Smart phones , AI and Google come from the states, but that doesn't eve
5.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
Yes but European economies benefit from the American approach without all the downsides. You guys got Google and smartphones and AI in the past couple decades. Europeans lack technical innovation and they don't need it because the inno
6.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
The author is talking about restructuring syntax in the destructing match. Rust Has this with "match" but only via a single ref. You would have to make alternative restructuring syntax to go into the match expression if you want i
7.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
The concept is arbitrary. It's a made up concept. It's an arbitrary collection of empathic and and sympathetic traits bundled up together to be a definition of another arbitrary word. Similar to "what is sentience?" Peop
8.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
I think the content of this post is pretty bad and a lot of it is bullshit. But I disagree with your logic here. You should not flag a post based off of character you should flag a post based off of the content. Deepaks reputation should no
9.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
>It's a male-heavy class and when these terms come up, they tend to laugh it off as some kind of esotherical side-quest. It is a sort of side quest. You think the discussion is about something profound but really you're just di
10.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
The list on rust here isn't opinionated. It's a general swath of every resource that's available.
11.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
Just get the basics down for traits, borrowing and move semantics. Make sure you have thorough understanding of heap and stack. Once those are down you can move on to projects. Rust is sufficiently complex that you have to do projects to en
12.
by fkcgnad 3y ago
From the analytical trends and tooling it's passed the hump of mainstream in the sense that it can be used for prod. It's sort of culty still but it's no longer a niche thing anymore and very usable. The only avenue that it h