Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fiso64
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
fiso64
3y ago
>The capacity for an oven to cook food may be measured by how much smoke it lets of when burning -- but no amount of "smoke" establishes that a dry ice machine can cook. You seem to be talking past me, as nowhere did I claim th
32.
▲
by
fiso64
3y ago
Don't try to ham-fist scientific sounding wording into your (very unscientific) argument. This is not a disproof of anything because you failed to define what it means to have the ability to form rational thoughts. With a definition,
33.
▲
by
fiso64
3y ago
It's not strangers approaching random people on the street, it's an anonymous survey in which you have to willingly participate, so I don't think any of these expectations could have significantly affected this statistic.
34.
▲
by
fiso64
3y ago
Humans make foolish, nonsensical mistakes too. Does that mean that they're not intelligent and not sensitive to the meaning of the code?
35.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
Exactly... In other words, they say that they don't know whether this will get us to AGI.
36.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
>not even their creators argue that Yes, their creators take the far more defensible and scientific position of saying "we don't know".
37.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
Indeed, my fingerprint in https://www.amiunique.org/fp appears to be unique when using the Mullvad browser.
38.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
>XMR does things that supposedly make that not really work at all Any source? Can't find anything.
39.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
Are you referring to PALM-E? It didn't have any positive transfer for NLP tasks, in fact the unfrozen model performed slightly worse after the finetune. That being said, PALM-E wasn't really a multimodal model from the start, it&
40.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
Huh.. I think the reason they don't go in-depth and fail to "debunk" those types of rebuttals, as does anybody else for that matter (including you), is because they can't actually do it. Feel free to prove me wrong thoug
41.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
I'm wondering if these statistics adjust for age. Wealthier people are usually older and therefore less fertile. Also, there may be selection bias at play here since whoever is more wealthy is more likely to prioritize their career ove
42.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
Keeping track of different usernames is hard, and I can't blame you for confusing me with the other guy :) snark aside, I think he does have a point - afaik, we don't know what intelligence is, so it's kinda hard to make any
43.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
>the human brain is just an LLM Never have I said such a thing. Also, BPEs aren't a natural limitation of any transformer-based model, it's a trick to save compute for LLMs.
44.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
Uh, no.. I don't believe I did. Asking it to count the letters in a word is like asking a human to listen for a 30kHz tone without them knowing that humans can't hear it. I'd expect a lot of false positives.
45.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
>if you ask it to count the number of letters in a word it will cheerfully pump out the wrong answer ("there are thirteen letters in the word 'twelve'") Not to be too blunt, but you seem to be talking out of your ass.
46.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
No controlled trial means we don't know if it's helping or not. Nobody is saying that the legal drinking age is the sole determinant of addiction rates.
47.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
I'm not sure this statistic tells us much. It'd be more interesting to compare something like teen alcoholism rates vs legal drinking age. For all we know an age requirement may very well lower alcohol abuse rates. Besides, I real
48.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
Next up is training multimodal models on audio and video. Humans may see less text, but they still train on more data in total.
49.
▲
by
fiso64
4y ago
ChatGPT was also trained with reinforcement learning to produce outputs human raters preferred