4 ms·

>not even their creators argue that Yes, their creators take the far more defensible and scientific position of saying "we don't know".

• lm28469 4y ago
  Not at all Same Altman (openAI ceo) : > The GPT-4 rumor mill is a ridiculous thing. I don’t know where it all comes from, people are begging to be disappointed and they will be. The hype is just like... We don’t have an actual AGI
  • letmevoteplease 4y ago
    He was responding to viral tweets[1] that said GPT-4 had "100 trillion parameters" and was "500x more powerful than GPT-3," which is indeed absurd hype. On the other hand, two weeks ago a team of Microsoft researchers put out a paper claiming that GPT-4 "could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system." [1] https://twitter.com/andrewsteinwold/status/1594889562526027777 https://twitter.com/andrewsteinwold/status/15948895625260277... [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712
    • lm28469 4y ago
      You're missing the end of the quote, a bit further in the next sentence: > including the possible need for pursuing a new paradigm that moves beyond next-word prediction. So all in all "it's not AGI and we might need a paradigm shift to achieve it" A paradigm shift being: "a fundamental change in approach or underlying assumptions."
      • fiso64 4y ago
        Exactly... In other words, they say that they don't know whether this will get us to AGI.