firefax

23 ms·

421.
by firefax 1y ago
https://www.newgrounds.com/tubby/netfreedom.html This is the page I was referring to. Looks like the nonprofit involved might not still be around?
422.
by firefax 1y ago
>These are actual hackers [clicks] >The certificate for hakmem.org expired on 5/8/2021.
423.
by firefax 1y ago
single use vapes should be outlawed imho -- it's so wasteful to include both the cart and the "pen" (power delivery) in one package to be thrown away.
424.
The Cricket as a Thermometer (1897)(journals.uchicago.edu)
2 points by firefax 1y ago|0 comments
425.
by firefax 1y ago
You could use a psudonym. That's what I'm doing. Occasionally I shed a username and start a new one. The admins here seem not to mind as long as I'm not voting more than once or ban evading, and the same goes for most sites.
426.
by firefax 1y ago
What specifically about your personality even came out during the interview? Like, did they ask where you like to walk your dog and you said you have a cat? Give us some details. I've had the opposite problem -- folks would like me as
427.
by firefax 1y ago
>This seems totally unrelated to whether cannabis should be recreational. Basically, they only pretend it's "medical" in order to gatekeep and rentseek care. Since they are interested in profit rather than actual services,
428.
by firefax 1y ago
As one might guess from my username, I run Firefox. I love it -- I have it customized just the way I like it. I think if they focused on memory issues rather than wizbang new features, paired with getting android and iOS versions up to snuf
429.
by firefax 1y ago
More evidence cannabis needs to be recreational. We can let people use their FSA money for it and/or give a steep discount to people who "really" need it, like cancer patients... but I think a lot of people who bounce between
430.
by firefax 1y ago
Also in general Google satellite offices often house the engineers of acquired startups who don't want to move to the mothership. It's not their primary purpose but it's one of the things they use them for.
431.
by firefax 1y ago
MySpace's glitz was partly due to poor input sensitization. They tried to weed out things like <script> tags while leaving folks the ability to rewrite the HTML on their pages.
432.
by firefax 1y ago
This simply states "This file is hosted on Newgrounds.com"
433.
by firefax 1y ago
>You can find Teletubby Fun Land here: < https://www.newgrounds.com/tubby >. If you want to read more about the BBC situation, then click on the middle finger that’s on that page. Thanks for that, sadly it looks like
434.
by firefax 1y ago
There was absolutely a brief legal threat paired with a comedic "fuck you we have fair use" page up on their site at one point. I don't think they'd be talking about fair use if they were just being interviewed about how
435.
by firefax 1y ago
Ah ok. Weird way to cite a book title.
436.
by firefax 1y ago
>One alternative is to create a website that outs the company that is harming you in a way that is non-libelous and just tells your story Ironically this HN post will probably be higher in search results for their name. OP it looks like
437.
Conspiracy as Governance (2006) [pdf](web.cs.ucdavis.edu)
2 points by firefax 1y ago|0 comments
438.
by firefax 1y ago
>This is not unlike the surprise in underground.txt I thought that was originally a book? I distinctly remember reading it during an in school suspension in the 2000s. I tried to go back to my township library and read it again years lat
439.
by firefax 1y ago
Newgrounds taught me about the "fair use" defense when parodying wayyyyy back when their "Teletubby fun land" got them the ire of the BBC's lawyers. I can't find anything documenting that saga -- in fact, it lo
440.
by firefax 1y ago
>There's also lots of possibilities outside of software. High end rates for online English lessons are around $40/hour though that's if you go independent, self promotion, etc - which is kind of tedious. But if you can tap
441.
by firefax 1y ago
Sorry I was snippy, I thought they were casting aspersions on the science inside the article due to the date, which is a pet peeve given anything biosciences related moves much more slowly than CS given the (rightful and good) restrictions
442.
by firefax 1y ago
>It's common practice here to point out the date of older articles so the year can be added to the post title. I see, I hope you can understand where I was coming from, seeing the year in the title paired with what looks like a snar
443.
by firefax 1y ago
>Published in 2014. Yes, that is in the article. Anything you wish to add? Developments since then the article lacks?
444.
by firefax 1y ago
>Let me be crystal. TL;DR Only babbling fools think America isn't capable of crossing any line right now I think the babbling fools are the ones with multiple passports, ignorant of their privilege, who demand that the same untraine
445.
by firefax 1y ago
>Biden proposed and backed a boost of the federal minimum wage to $15/hr... Prior to that, President Obama also backed a federal minimum wage increase I don't have time to get into the specifics with you, but to put it in poker
446.
by firefax 1y ago
>It's morally repugnant to blame someone for their own death from cancer like this. No, it's rude and weird to chastise someone for rightfully advocating treatment. He didn't state that he didn't want to risk the horr
447.
by firefax 1y ago
>If removed in 3 years. So many societal norms are being broken, what's one more. Are you American? I don't think you understand our culture if you go down this road. Trump operates in the gray -- gray enabled in part by two De
448.
by firefax 1y ago
But what is the "best outcome" when you have your house paid off and ample savings? He got ripped off by Jobs early on, but Jobs also let him do the work he wanted -- it's rare to have someone as good as Woz was also understa
449.
by firefax 1y ago
Thanks, the open course is exactly the kind of thing I was looking for.
450.
Ask HN: What would you read to learn about "artificial intelligence"?
2 points by firefax 1y ago|2 comments

More ›