fewbenefit

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by fewbenefit 1y ago

   This post reads like someone who just discovered the OSI model and tried to shoehorn it into neurobiology. The idea that the "revolution" is a hardware layer that just plugs into the brain and expands it with new neurons assumes a
2. 2.▲
   by fewbenefit 1y ago

   One thing people often miss: Gmail’s search isn’t broken because it’s technically hard. It’s broken because it's not a priority. Accurate, user-respecting search doesn’t drive engagement or ad revenue. Nudging you toward the Promotions
3. 3.▲
   by fewbenefit 1y ago

   I’m mostly web/backend so not deep in iOS, but SwiftUI does look like yet another case of abstracting away control in the name of “ease.” Same pattern with React: move logic to declarative bindings, then spend hours debugging state syn
4. 4.▲
   by fewbenefit 1y ago

   Switching apps isn't the root problem, switching contexts is. If tools are well-integrated and mentally compartmentalized (e.g., Slack for fast input, Notion for synthesis, Jira for logistics), switching shouldn't feel painful. Bu
5. 5.▲
   Are we overfitting our code to trends instead of problems?

   10 points by fewbenefit 1y ago|8 comments
6. 6.▲
   Are we overfitting our code to trends instead of problems?

   2 points by fewbenefit 1y ago|0 comments
7. 7.▲
   by fewbenefit 1y ago

   The idea reminds me of how data -> information -> knowledge -> wisdom has been discussed for decades. INK feels like a rebrand of that chain, just trimmed. Not saying it's bad, just not sure what's actually new here