Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
felipellrocha
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
91.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
Have you considered that these "detractors" might just be former users of the language themselves, who felt liberated once they tried something else, and want to help other people not feel stuck as well?
92.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
i see what you did there
93.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
Just because that is a common feature of ponzi schemes, that alone doesn't make it a ponzi scheme. A ponzi scheme takes some sort of initial investment from new investors and gives that back to old investors in form of "return&quo
94.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
Web3 are browser-based wallets (or mobile based) that can authorize transactions in a blockchain securely because it's separate from the web page itself. When I use metamask to buy something on the chain, it'll ask me to confirm i
95.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
Many people have tried that in the past, but none have become super popular games. Maybe it's just not what people want, or maybe we haven't seen a game that has cracked that formula yet.
96.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
That is exactly what they are, and I don't think they hide it?! So, I don't know what the issue it. This is the kind of innovation that keeps us moving forward.
97.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
I wouldn't say it's disrespectful, but I'd bring it up with him, and explain: "You've been helpful, but the CEO role will be mine." If he balks, move on. Simple as that. You don't have to be assume this is
98.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
Seems like they're using some features that are not available in all browsers, and failing with a single error message instead of explaining which feature is missing.
99.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
While I mostly agree with you, banning the personal accounts from their *team* is a bit much. Specially considering how that also includes access to Instagram, and WhatsApp, WhatsApp being the biggest issue here since in many countries that
100.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
It’s only a falacy if the authority is not an expert in the field they’re speaking about. Example, a religious leader speaking about science matters, or an accountant speaking about engineering matters. Otherwise, the argument is 100% valid
101.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
You know the answer. You'll need to sacrifice things, so make a list of priorities. You'll need to make your own time, so create a schedule. You'll need support, so talk to the people you need.
102.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
If you are doing p2p, though, webrtc makes a lot of sense since the apis there are designed to punch through a nat
103.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
I think the main benefit of a constitutional monarchy is that you split the job of appearance of propriety away from the job of actual governance. Look at the US for example, the selection of a president is both trying to figure out who can
104.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
Came here to say this. The numbers seem to off to me.
105.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
At that point in a startup’s lifecycle it’s all about hard skills all the way. Hard skills and culture. Everything else can be taught.
106.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
Lol. Talk about straw man argument.
107.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
I think you know the answer: > The recent interest rate hikes also didn't seem to have nearly as much impact on the markets as everyone feared they would. Markets aren’t rational
108.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
I am on the same boat. It's just too good. There are flaws, for sure, but it seems like the language itself is going on an incredibly good direction.
109.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
It's only a big deal if you're poor, though. It says so in the Constitution... /s
110.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
Because there is no way this is true: > - no "unknown unknowns". it's so tired and true, there's no surprises
111.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
You're telling me your solution is to do the same thing we used to do with forced birthday party celebrations, but more frequently? UGH!
112.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
This is just an argument to not do anything in disguise of being rational. (1) We can tackle multiple things at once, (2) some of those things are like the way they are because of the current state of tech: take a look at Amazon trying to b
113.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
I do not need amazon to have my medical records. I guess it’s time to cancel that subscription.
114.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
Same. I left thinking that the concept was cool, but the problem they had was discoverability. Bad actors were taking advantage of the system and pushing down good content. It was cool for the first 3 weeks when the content was amazing, and
115.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
To be fair, at this point the dude is just going through the motions and the media keep blowing things up.
116.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
It isn’t, though. The point is that you *can* write it without thr Arc<Mutex<>> and gain significant speed without it. Even if your first iteration started with it.
117.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
I was about to say. You could avoid a ton of ‘Rc’s by just using channels instead.
118.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
I think you missed the point
119.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
I don't think billionaires care about reputation that much
120.
▲
by
felipellrocha
4y ago
I find it pretty honest. Very to your face, instead of that whole big family thing where everyone pretends to love each other, which you pointed out is worse.
More ›