felanthropop

12 ms·

1.
by felanthropop 14y ago
Please change the font. The word "meme" looks like "mcmc". As a developer that is much closer to 50 than many here are, I can say that it's a crapshoot whether I will be programming when I'm 50. I tired of it after a handful of years, but d
2.
by felanthropop 14y ago
Everything sounded great up to this point: "There are however two glaring problems (IMHO): 1. Voting is optional;" When people have to vote, they will vote for things they are undecided on and it is likely that stupid things will play int
3.
by felanthropop 14y ago
And odds are the guys that wrote this paper don't have any clue that even if those writing the CLI tools/libraries/frameworks that use SSL had locked them completely down, developers and sysadmins would write scripts to agree-to-all, fake a
4.
by felanthropop 14y ago
wash post link on that page is dead, so... useless. but here is something: http://www.federalnewsradio.com/473/3056196/White-House-test... Which linked to this which scares me. A new CMM from may that deals with energy. CMM red tape didn'
5.
by felanthropop 14y ago
TBL wanted to use the anchor tag for it: http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0186.ht... "I had imagined that figues would be reprented as <a name=fig1 href="fghjkdfghj" REL="EMBED, PRESENT">Figure </a>" Th
6.
by felanthropop 14y ago
But, if trying to eliminate cruft, why include define_singleton_method? Why not just set the proper scope and define_method? Same with instance_eval, class_eval (and module_eval maybe?)- why not just set the scope to define whether you are
7.
by felanthropop 14y ago
tl;dr summary: We're all screwed and the hippie progressives and tea partiers can't save us because they aren't being really innovative and getting to the heart of the problem. So first off- I agree. Second, this post is way too long, pisse