Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fedeb95
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
121.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
thanks for the book suggestions.
122.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
try waking up 3-4 hours before work and do something else you want to do but requires more energy. It's hard to keep the habit in today society, but it can be done. Typically you can do your work good enough with less energy, if you&#x
123.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
Am I the only one thinking this urge to optimize our time is just anxiety? I'd argue not spending time worried about time usage would make one use better its time. I'm not referring to the article per se, but to this kind of artic
124.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
Monopolies naturally come from doing a thing the best possible way. YouTube does it. I personally use it very rarely and wouldn't care about its disappearance, but I don't know of other services serving its users needs better. So:
125.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
that they worked for money doesn't mean money was the only thing attached to their art. You quoted a period very different from now, where there wasn't any stupid royalty or copyright: you had to work in order to earn money, if yo
126.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
not exactly. Literature existed way before physical books, as is the case of the Odyssey and other texts.
127.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
literature was born without copyright. It won't vanish
128.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
copying paper is not as easy as copying a file. You should try, even making a simple paper notebook that doesn't fall apart isn't easy, let alone print a book. The tech industry may very well cease to exist as we know it, but the
129.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
Copyright restrictions of digital contents is a vestige of the past. Given today technologies, it is rather obsolete. For those thinking it goes against artists, keep in mind that a lot of art today is simply garbage made only for money. If
130.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
yes but you have to type sfhit+enter, while a single "new line key inside the message" would be better for the specific task.
131.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
We need two keys, one for new line inside a MS Teams message, the other for sending the message
132.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
A motto for corporate programmers
133.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
If you share the post opinion, it means you believe there is value in an hardware that provides enough details in order to run any software we want on it. If that is the case, go build a company that builds such an hardware.
134.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
that's a good point and indeed a problem in the original post context. I am of course talking from my privileged perspective where my country doesn't do that so I don't have that problem.
135.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
it depends. I myself have some combination of browser extensions which make me a bad guy in Cloudflare opinion. I don't know exactly which one is the culprit because I added a lot of stuff over the years, but I really don't care:
136.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
I'm wondering about the "any" part. How does it perform on big codebases? Like ~20 repositories with lots of classes.
137.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
intersting idea to do it in a distributed way with people help.
138.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
don't always feel forced to express your opinion.
139.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
this works also in general purpose corporate programming.
140.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
Until you really restrict the net, it's just a matter of building new software that can't be the target of those laws by design. If you restrict the net, there's no inter-net.
141.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
This works very well and I'd whish I'd convince my team members to use more this technique. Moreover: you can separate types based on admitted values and perform runtime checks. Percentage, Money, etc.
142.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
I can't edit anymore so I'll comment. My point is that it's epistemically interesting. What makes it so is that it's hard (at least to me) to decide who's right or wrong. To do so would need an expert-level understa
143.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
this still doesn't imply it is worth checking out.
144.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
most ai tools run on the web, so the question is ill-posed. Not worth opening the article.
145.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
thinking that our own judgement is better than a doctor judgement, supported by a vast community and shared knowledge, is epistemically interesting. Beware that I'm not saying that doctors, or the scientific community, can't be wr
146.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
the level of trust the author has in systems built by people with power is interesting.
147.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
about unsolvability, it depends. In some contexts there are undecidable problems, like the halting problem, but I get your point.
148.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
yes that's my point. The article seems to suggest that the opposite is true, that without a specialist you can solve special problems with an unlearned user and a LLM.
149.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
> Democratize access to engineering You don't need as specialized skillsets to build complex apps, you just need to know how to put context together and iterate I feel it is exactly the opposite. AI helps specialists iterat
150.
▲
by
fedeb95
1y ago
traditions have value ;)
More ›