febra_

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by febra_ 3y ago

   That youtube channel surely is a.. ride. Makes me question the legitimacy of these videos
2. 2.▲
   by febra_ 3y ago

   I have this book. It's been more than great. I fully recommend it to anyone looking for a quick and simple introduction to linear algebra
3. 3.▲
   by febra_ 3y ago

   Good. X is a trash fire and the more companies leave it, the better for everyone.
4. 4.▲
   by febra_ 3y ago

   So would the wise policy in this case be to restrict people's access to milk products?
5. 5.▲
   by febra_ 3y ago

   This has to be a parody. I get that you can try to calculate some level of correlation, sure. But to jump straight to "aiding policy makers to restrict advertisement and access to" is making some insanely huge implications that
6. 6.▲
   by febra_ 3y ago

   Unsurprising. I have some friends that worked in R&D for T. and have told me some horrifying stories.
7. 7.▲
   by febra_ 3y ago

   Good. Hiding income only works for the company to exploit their workers.
8. 8.▲
   by febra_ 3y ago

   Watch HN posters scramble to find a reason to bash this because it has been pushed by California
9. 9.▲
   by febra_ 3y ago

   What about the alt/far-right? They fall under the umbrella of populism and seem quite dangerous, especially towards minorities.
10. 10.▲
    by febra_ 3y ago

    It's just the Economist. I wouldn't expect more from them.
11. 11.▲
    by febra_ 3y ago

    > while putting a substantial portion of GDP into building nuclear reactors and removing carbon from the atmosphere. So, the first one taking decades and the second one being a meme """solution""" for the sc