Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fault1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
121.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
Isn't this the norm in places like Sweden? https://www.ft.com/content/2a9274be-72aa-11e7-93ff-99f383b09... I suspect in the future all salaries will be public.
122.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
Match is a small part of IAC, no? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAC_(company)
123.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
Some compilers also use the ECS "pattern" quite heavily. Case in point: rustc: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6b44kMS6OM&t=1263s
124.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
I think there is most definitely conditioning going on. I watched my fiance click on one of the "accept all cookies" GDPR-prompts (it's become an antipattern) a few days ago. She almost automatically did it without thinking.
125.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
how do you think google, an adtech company, makes money?
126.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
this is all true, but consider a computing model that almost was: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescript_(programming_langua... telescript was kinda of weird, but wildly ahead of its time. the idea was decentralized
127.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
a lot of it is stuff its runtime loads by default, like huge BLAS buffers, the llvm orc and such. I think there have been steps recently to make those optional recently. Julia was really optimized for "big iron"-styles of workload
128.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
yes, i'd say there is both societal taboo (especially outright culling them rather than just throwing stones at them to chase them away) and legal restrictions: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/world&#x
129.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
yes, and python has a large amount of analyzers: https://github.com/typeddjango/awesome-python-typing https://github.com/ethanhs/python-typecheckers though i'd say they are worse than similar
130.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
Personally, I think interactive usage has improved quite a bit. I don't "feel" it that badly in 1.7. It was bad enough earlier in the 1.0 series that I stopped using it for a while (I used it before <1.0 as well). I think
131.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
These are what i'd say, as someone who has tinkered with it a lot but uses python/C++ for $day_job: - immature web/network services stack. For better or worse the lang seemed to focus on more number crunching throughput early
132.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
> Looking at recent Python code, it also seems like the simplicity is being lost in the rush to add features. this has been true for a while, the 'zen of python' was lost a long time ago. i think this is partially because of ho
133.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
julia can do things sort of like this because it has juxtaposition = 'implicit multiplication' julia's parser (which is written in scheme!): https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/s
134.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
This story reminds me of Jane Goodall writing about the Gombe Chimpanzee War: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gombe_Chimpanzee_War#War
135.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
> The basic functionality of Google Analytics does not have a way to identify you server-side. I know that used to be true, but is that true anymore? I saw comments like this in previous discussions about this snippet: https://
136.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
maybe, but you are likely using their software or services, so in some sense, it's "first party" data, where at least historically, some expectation of privacy has not been as strong since you are in effect, having direct int
137.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
it depends on what you call 'hinduism'. it's one of the world's most heterodox religions and has absorbed a huge amount of cultural tradition from at least 300 languages. The rig veda is probably what most people agree i
138.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
I mean, the old adage is: google knows what you browse facebook knows who you know amazon knows what you buy but for a browser company, isn't a browser extension better than some other way to opt out? otherwise they would have to assoc
139.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
native python is indeed quite slow relative to anything compiled, especially when you want to use pure python for hot loops. it's really the saving grace of cython (or alternatives) that makes python tractible for a lot of scientific c
140.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
Self was quite influential in the language development world however, perhaps most so in JavaScript itself. StrongTalk was also very influential, because many of its developers also ended up working on core parts of the JVM and V8 JITs both
141.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
yes, could happen. modernity tends to change culture (and especially homogenization that the interwebs promotes), and india is modernizing rapidly especially cities. culture can change very rapidly. that being said, hanuman (rama's mon
142.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
I think Smalltalk's demise was really from the fact that it was a entire environment that had to live in a virtual machine. Especially in the 70s and 80s, that was a huge performance barrier. Contrast this with C, which probably won be
143.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
yeah, but your claim was "Note also that Julia would be number 1 in almost all of those benchmarks if you were to rank by speed of second run" notice this isn't even a language vs language benchmark. it's libraries and f
144.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
That makes sense, but I still think the meta name is confusing. I mean, as a user the fact that it was implemented using metaprogramming techniques has no bearing, it's an implementation detail. Actually, my brain never thought to asso
145.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
yes, it's true that with sophisticated gradual typing and expressive static langs, dynamic and static languages are far more similar than they used to be. personally, I still enjoy the extreme dynamism of lisp and lisp-like langs (juli
146.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
DataFramesMeta is great! But I always get confused by the name. Since DataFrames.jl is lower level shouldn't that be DataFramesBase.jl and the meta package be DataFrames.jl?
147.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
Sure, IO is often the bottleneck, but the python interpreter can most definitely add a lot of overhead, which can add a lot of operational costs. Personally, even in IO bound applications, I prefer something like Go or Elixir, and with thos
148.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
the other cool thing about wolfram functions is that they really embrace the whole "content addressed function" idiom (like unison). code is data is a networked resource.
149.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
It depends on what you want to do obviously. pytorch historically hasn't really focused on forward mode auto differentiation: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/10223 this definitely limits its ge
150.
▲
by
fault1
5y ago
I also get quite aggressive mobile notifications from them.
More ›