fashion-at-cost

5 ms·

1.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
Plenty of crowds at my local theaters.
2.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
Your analysis misses the incredibly important caveat that revenue rises with inflation – or sometimes even faster. 50 years ago, a movie ticket was 0.50 cents in revenue. Today, it’s $25. That’s a 50x increase… a dollar in 50 years might be
3.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
Or a traditional Maté
4.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
The benefit with the two device approach is when you can not carry both devices for the majority of the time. If i’m not explicitly on call, my work device isn’t with me. Anything anyone says to me will wait until I’m back in the office
5.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
I would have to strongly recommend nobody enroll a personal device in a company MDM. If the company needs you to have mobile connectivity that badly, they can give you a device.
6.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
Not a chance that will happen, given the corn production of America. We have the most productive land in the world for growing maize, and Lord knows we’ll find shit to do with it.
7.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
A point of clarification: Biden pardoned his son because he was a three time convicted felon. Certainly not because of fears of Trump: he was convicted of these federal felonies while Biden was in office. He additionally pardoned the enti
8.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
Roe v Wade was — along with all the other things he has had a hand in removing — not a good thing. But don’t take my word for it, look to what actual (female) supreme court justices have said about it: It was over-broad and questionably d
9.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
Reading into it a bit more, it seems like essentially the idea is you can take a sort of 2D Fourier Transform of the CMB, and the 4th and 8th terms of this series are generally aligned with the solar system’s axis. It’s interesting, but n
10.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
Huh - if all you read was Wiki’s content “above the fold”, it would seem pretty conclusively debunked. But once you expand the actual evidence it’s far more mixed. There does not appear to be any consensus at all.
11.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
Nice. I kinda wish they went all the way and modified the commit details to have the actual authoring dates for each amendment/etc. Anyone know how well git plays with pre-epoch timestamps?
12.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
Is this anything but a really long winded way of saying that they got a better fit from their model by adding more parameters? That’s not news…
13.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
A single reader thread cannot read a value written by a write, then later read a value written by a write that happens before the first write.
14.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
In this context, ”happens before” is not a wall-clock colloquialism but in fact a term of art that is specifically described as: > The happens before relation is defined as the transitive closure of the union of the sequenced before
15.
by fashion-at-cost 2y ago
The goalposts have been moved. The claim is that this pattern isn’t suitable for production code. The ground truth is that a compliant Go implementation may elect to: crash; read the first value ever set to the variable for the entire lifet