fargle

9 ms·

91.
by fargle 2y ago
no idea. the title is just wrong/typo was my only point. elon says it can, so what does that tell you?
92.
by fargle 2y ago
*can not can't in the title
93.
by fargle 2y ago
> To illustrate, consider if we rewrite the title: “Goodbye, Phillips head screwdrivers, I wish you success, but I’m back to flat heads”. Seems silly, doesn’t it? you could just as easily say "goodbye allen, but i'm going to to
94.
by fargle 2y ago
well, that's simply not how any business works, even in the most extreme naively theoretical socialistic case. why would a company do that? - employees don't (generally) own the company. even for some reason they were forced to, i
95.
by fargle 2y ago
what this is showing is simply more of google abusing their monopoly. making linking to maps from search harder and inconvenient for users does not help the users, nor smaller independent companies, nor really anybody at all. but that'
96.
by fargle 2y ago
https://www.misawa.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/77360...
97.
by fargle 2y ago
firing the right 10% each year would be great, but that's the problem. can you expect the management correctly identify the right people to fire, especially when they are themselves heavily over-represented in that class?
98.
by fargle 2y ago
asking for a friend: can i combine systemd and selinux with k8s?
99.
by fargle 2y ago
well, plagiarizing from whoever OpenAI plagiarized it from...
100.
by fargle 2y ago
while not the direct subject of this issue, that blog post is completely unhinged. as a sibling comment said: "idiots all around". or perhaps simply extremely bad at interpreting and handling social skills and emotions.
101.
by fargle 2y ago
that's an surprisingly interesting subject. short answer: state laws. longer answer is it's done with a patchwork of federal and state laws, partially to avoid calling a permit a "permit" or saying "gun registry&quo
102.
by fargle 2y ago
i think you are replying to the wrong comment? i didn't mention "woke". i don't go near twitter; impossible to read. the point i was making is that demonizing the centrists who hadn't already made up their mind, was
103.
by fargle 2y ago
as harsh as it sounds, the point is that as the commander: "the buck stops here" yes, he didn't do anything by the book, but the command still suffered a great deal of embarrassment and loss. there's nothing dishonorable
104.
by fargle 2y ago
> his criminal behaviour openly going after him that way and trying to "destroy" him (letisha), using the legal system as a bludgeon for political reasons was a huge mistake. so this continuously worked for him, not against. yo
105.
by fargle 2y ago
the consequences are you loose your money if you invest in stupid
106.
by fargle 2y ago
just over-enforcement of the anti-redditism rule on top level comments is sometimes, in itself, distracting.
107.
by fargle 2y ago
"it basically simply just sounds like we have a volunteer"
108.
by fargle 2y ago
this simply matches the `crc_reflected()` in section 18 of "A Painless Guide to CRC Error Detection Algorithms" [1] with hardcoded init and final xor's to match one specific CRC-32 spec. nothing wrong with that, but it isn&#x
109.
by fargle 2y ago
no worries. that's interesting, i figured that might happen sometimes - kind of a hidden free trial.
110.
by fargle 2y ago
people who "think like me" already full well know the difference between assholes blocking intersections for bawdy adrenaline-infused juvenile behavior and closures by the proper authorities for an emergency . don't equate w
111.
by fargle 2y ago
so lets say you drive up to one of these in a minivan and try to cross through it to pick up your kids from preschool. what are the odds do you think it would end in property damage? assault? death? pretty much 100% at least injury and dest
112.
by fargle 2y ago
if you are going to post a paywalled article, please post an archive link so we can read it: https://archive.is/BdJKA
113.
by fargle 2y ago
how will they wine and dine you? i guess they could use door-dash. or give you that big, wide, very fake smile and proudly remember your name almost correctly. will they ever actually tell you the prices of what you are asking for at the qu
114.
by fargle 2y ago
> Why are Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk suing compounding pharmacies, then? > Why is the FDA warning that some compounding pharmacies are using the salt forms of semaglutide and tirzepatide? because $ $$$$$$$$$$$$ that's why. not sa
115.
by fargle 2y ago
thanks for the hint. i found https://www.probell.com/lexra/ sheesh, patent https://patents.google.com/patent/US4814976A/en is a real "gem" but its probably a good example: faulty pa
116.
by fargle 2y ago
> If Arm follows through with the license termination, Qualcomm would be prevented from doing its own designs using Arm’s instruction set i'm not sure this is true. certainly "chip" IP has been a real legal quagmire since,
117.
by fargle 2y ago
all true. but rather than be frustrated, i just see it as an opportunity - your saying that there's a scarcity of people who know the material? if it's valuable, then that should lead to higher value for the good ones. don't
118.
by fargle 2y ago
of course, but in that case it's not the base imperative abstraction that's leaky - it's the multi-thread/multi-core abstraction built on top of it - it's almost as easy as multiple threads happening in parallel.
119.
by fargle 2y ago
the author is misusing the "leaky abstraction" idea. in the section "what's in a leak" a rather muddy argument is made that a leak is that which forces you to bend your program to accommodate it. so `leak => acco
120.
by fargle 2y ago
> this is an abstraction that should almost certainly leak. that's not a leak, that is the abstraction for procedural/imperative code, or at least an important part of it. essentially: "each step occurs in order and the

More ›