3 ms·
firing the right 10% each year would be great, but that's the problem. can you expect the management correctly identify the right people to fire, especially wh
by fargle 2y ago
firing the right 10% each year would be great, but that's the problem.
can you expect the management correctly identify the right people to fire, especially when they are themselves heavily over-represented in that class?
- seiferteric 2y agoMaybe employees get a vote on who to fire.
- fargle 2y agowell, that's simply not how any business works, even in the most extreme naively theoretical socialistic case. why would a company do that? - employees don't (generally) own the company. even for some reason they were forced to, in practice, a cadre of employees (most likely the ones you'd want to fire in the first place), would instantly form some new ad-hoc political layer to exercise political power and control the organization, voting, etc. so you just end up with a layer of useless management and a independent layer of useless politicians, neither of which are willing to fire themselves.