Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fao_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
511.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
I think you're reading into it. They are stating that the solution in the post was overengineered, and describing an alternate solution that doesn't require as much abstraction or resources, but is manageable for data with a much
512.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
I meant threading in as much as the connections or links between message data All discord needs to store is: { channel_id, message_id, user_id, content, reply_to, datetime } these days they added an extra thread_id field, sure. But the data
513.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
Are you not sure that financial data "with hundreds of fields" is more complex than chat data which has a relatively linear threading and only a handful of fields?
514.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
I'm not sure why you're being downvoted when you're a domain expert talking about your craft? People have weird hangups on hacker news, it seems
515.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
I'm not sure why you're getting downvoted -- the top comment and highest rated replies are bikeshedding about AI, you're actually showing that this is a pattern of shitty behaviour by Google.
516.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
> As one offs we can find a multitude of good solutions. The problem is finding affordable mass produced options for all the people who can’t afford iteresting bespoke solutions. Exactly, because the resources actually exist but nobody c
517.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
"""In 1970, the book The Wolf: Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species was published, written by David Mech. It was a success. The book helped to popularize the alpha concept, because many people referred to Mech's
518.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
I see someone else has been reading YOSPOS?
519.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
Parsing it manually is actually the preferred choice for most compilers, both GCC and Clang do it manually, for example.
520.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
I don't think anyone can blame someone for having security vulnerabilities on a platform that they explicitly do not support.
521.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
You kind of can already, I know this isn't what you mean , but you can connect to unix sockets via a native application. "Native messaging enables an extension to exchange messages with a native application, installed on the user
522.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
Well cited in the book I referenced (It's amusing to me how many people attempted to call me out on 'psuedoscience' and how I'm at -1 on the original post, despite the book I cited being a well-known, well-respected, and
523.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
The actual scientific diagrams were made with the purpose of 'demonstrating that bipoc are inferior'. It was outright phrenology, done in the 1800s, and has literally no basis in modern science!
524.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
It's scientific fact, all rigorously cited in the literature, but thank you for your concern.
525.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
Google Translate has a handwriting mode, and an image recognition mode.
526.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
It's because the evidence has been sharply contended for centuries, with an immense amount of outright false information and unreplicatable information being published in the 20th century, Fausto-Sterling's book Sexing the Body go
527.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
It seems closer to Refusal To Deal, but the wiki page on that is sparse: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refusal_to_deal It doesn't seem to fit the FTC's definition of that, either: https://www.ftc.g
528.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
> Why would any of the platforms join together? If all of the streamers had the same content, there'd be no point in having more than one streaming platform. I don't think you understand. A 'union' is simply a group
529.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
> People believe they have access to free thought, speech and completely objective information. Really though, your world view became limited, bias, censored, crafted and curated. Objective information is still there (google scholar, etc
530.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
How many times have you altered Firefox, though? Or Chromium? Or GIMP? Or any other large software project? Free as in freedom doesn't mean shit when codebases are so large as to be inscrutable and induplicable.
531.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
Both are at fault. The content owner wants to make money through Netflix and other distributors, without it they are limited by DVD sales which are dwindling. It would be very, very easy for all of the content distributors to band together
532.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
You can't view it if you don't have the data to show it!
533.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
Honestly, simplicity is the way of the future -- eventually we will not be able to deal with the huge stack of abstractions, and it will either topple like the apocryphal tower of bable, or we will invent a """god""
534.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
> Dismissing empirical evidence by clinging to philosophical assertions? Small nitpick -- Carmack's assertions are anecdotal, not empirical.
535.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
> It is naive to claim you can tell which part of Linus is and which isn't contributing to the success. Wasn't the other person doing exactly the same, just on the "pro-asshole" side of the argument?
536.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
It's also important noting, semi-related to your post, that nobody is pushing for trans-surgeries for teenagers -- they are pushing for puberty blockers . What this means is that puberty is medically halted until the teenager is a leg
537.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
In this specific instance, the author gave a written exemption to literally everyone, in public -- specifically to allow them to self-host and modify it. So the license does not apply with this exemption in place, and that would be arguable
538.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
> You license is non-standard and does not appear to permit self hosting. You were just given carte blanche to host it, by the author in public. If that isn't a legal exception, I really, really do not know what is. Also, if you do
539.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
Font design is all about the subtleties. I'm pretty sure most discrete classes of fonts look the same, distinguished by how they handle specific characters, and style and position the letters.
540.
▲
by
fao_
5y ago
> There's no standards body for these things. Yes there is -- it's called CUA (Common User Access) "The subset of CUA implemented in Microsoft Windows or OSF/Motif is generally considered a de facto standard to be fol
More ›