4 ms·
Are you not sure that financial data "with hundreds of fields" is more complex than chat data which has a relatively linear threading and only a handful of fiel
by fao_ 5y ago
Are you not sure that financial data "with hundreds of fields" is more complex than chat data which has a relatively linear threading and only a handful of fields?
- lmilcin 5y agoActually, our threading is quite simple. There is exactly as many threads (that do anything) as CPU cores.
- gpderetta 5y agoI think parent meant threading as in message threads.
- lmilcin 5y agoJust recently Symphony switched order in which I have received two messages from a colleague. This completely changed the meaning of the message and we got in an argument that was only resolved after I have posted screenshot of what he wrote. It seems, the threading might not be that simple after all.
- fao_ 5y agoI meant threading in as much as the connections or links between message data All discord needs to store is: { channel_id, message_id, user_id, content, reply_to, datetime } these days they added an extra thread_id field, sure. But the data itself is blisteringly uncomplex and there is only a single way to display it (ordered by time, i.e. the 'thread')
- phailhaus 5y agoI'm asking about how your system scales to the number of queries, but you seem to be taking every question personally. You seem to really want to make sure everyone knows that you think Discord's problems are easy to solve. I'm not saying Discord is more complicated, but you're not really giving enough information to prove that Discord's problems are a subset of yours. Do you support more simultaneous queries than Discord?
- fao_ 5y agoI think you need to recheck my username, you have mistaken me with another poster in the thread.