fao_

26 ms·

331.
by fao_ 3y ago
DMCA defines copying as theft. Derivative artwork requires paying the owner of the original copyright. > A "derivative work" is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramat
332.
by fao_ 3y ago
What's the difference between stolen art and ai generated stolen art? Both are illegal under the DMCA
333.
by fao_ 3y ago
citation needed. ADHD is a deficit in dopamine processing/production within the brain, it has physiological signs that we can look for: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s11689-022-09440-2
334.
by fao_ 3y ago
If you target C+POSIX, uh, yeah. It's entirely possible to be "done" with a project. Likewise, a hell of a lot of SDL1.2 projects will still compile and run fine.
335.
by fao_ 3y ago
Eh? The poster clearly said: > if you want to revive the source of a Minecraft 1.7.10 mod i.e. if you want to change/alter or recompile a mod for version 1.7.10 None of the things you have mentioned apply to this.
336.
by fao_ 3y ago
> Most normal users (aka if you read Hacker News, you're not one of those) don't and won't know about shift and control clicking. My boomer parents do. Most users I've seen in the wild do.
337.
by fao_ 3y ago
B12 deficiency doesn't permanently destroy it either. It's just the body cannot produce myelin, and if that happens for a long enough period of time, the nervous system is exposed to damage that is permanent, even after the body c
338.
by fao_ 3y ago
> Why does it seem bad? Less of something doesn't necessarily mean its bad. Myelin is pretty damn important for the brain's function. Signals go much, MUCH slower without myelin, and there are a number of clinical disease and
339.
by fao_ 3y ago
And the world production of food far exceeds the world's population, yes. The difficulty, as always, is logistics and economics.
340.
by fao_ 3y ago
lmao you're mixing up Free Software and Open Source Software, which are not the same thing .
341.
by fao_ 3y ago
> Is "open source strategy" purely an economic tool? Yes, because the only thing a good company cares about is economics -- namely, money. This is, very literally, what the Cathederal and the Bazaar was about. Exploiting people
342.
by fao_ 3y ago
Antisemitism, I think
343.
by fao_ 3y ago
Burden of proof is on you to explain why the person being challenged should be a scientist for it to matter :)
344.
by fao_ 3y ago
Are you a bot? You just submitted the article header back at this person
345.
by fao_ 3y ago
> I think any human who confuses smooth talking with making sense will be ruthlessly exploited in relatively near future Buddy, they already exist, and they're carrying MBAs, Teaching Degrees, and working the Stock Market. Anecdotal
346.
by fao_ 3y ago
Right, and that's a breach of the social contract vis a vis compiler authors and the language users, which is a social problem. The lack of safety here is because the GNU programmers detect the UB and decide to cowboy it. If you take t
347.
by fao_ 3y ago
> the vast majority of software is written for the benefit of its users, not that of its developers. No, the vast majority of software is written for the benefit of the company that's selling it. There's a very, very clear diff
348.
by fao_ 3y ago
The reasons for GNU bloat are well documented, but instead you are arguing over uhh... colour? ls outputting colour or not? Isn't that the very definition of bikeshedding?
349.
by fao_ 3y ago
I mean, I feel a sane reading of the C Standard means reading "undefined" as "unspecified by the standard, but dependent on the trust and common sense of the compiler authors" -- which, you know, I don't know that t
350.
by fao_ 3y ago
Because it's an authorial construct used as a plot device, and thus has only small value of mapping onto the real world.
351.
by fao_ 3y ago
I'd imagine it might be beneficial to you to read more than one book
352.
by fao_ 3y ago
It's likely just a typo. LR5 "civilisation"/"civilization" brings up nothing on google. I don't know why you would an LLM to know more. Based on the way the person is using it, it does not seem to equate t
353.
by fao_ 3y ago
Visiting The Orange Site provides a wealth of comedy
354.
by fao_ 3y ago
> I find it rather weird how little authoritative documentation there is about whether or not this property holds given how important it is. Well, it can't be that important then, can it? :)
355.
by fao_ 3y ago
> Telling people to just look it up is pretty much the antithesis of discussion. On the contrary, the quality of discussion would be much higher if people took one entire minute beforehand to research something. It is shameful and disap
356.
by fao_ 3y ago
"These things are also contaminated" is shoddy argumentative reasoning at best, it is not the "got ya" that you think it is . I never claimed that there aren't contaminants in food, and I don't see how it def
357.
by fao_ 3y ago
Likewise just because your body requires something doesn't mean that large doses of it are beneficial. See my followups, which address that and were written 30 minutes before your post :/
358.
by fao_ 3y ago
My quote answers the question of "why don't we all supplement with L-arginine long term" with "it's in basically all protein containing-foods, so it is not necessary". While you are right there may be individua
359.
by fao_ 3y ago
I clearly made a point of inquiring why the behaviour was performed, it was an honest inquiry, I am genuinely curious. For what it is worth, my context is that I have seen the behavior of asking the room, or even just throwing out conjectur
360.
by fao_ 3y ago
There's a large amount of precedence, that's why. Rather than asking the room, one would think the first step would be to obtain information and inform yourself. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/

More ›