falloutx

12 ms·

151.
by falloutx 8mo ago
Because the products have become terrible, and they keep using more AI to solve it when AI is the problem with Microsoft. Microsoft execs are only riding Azure success, rest of the orgs are completely useless.
152.
by falloutx 8mo ago
Microsoft can just get one of thier devs to build a coding agent but instead all of these companies are just bowing down to Anthropic just because Anthropic is selling execs a dream situation where they can fire most of the devs. None of th
153.
by falloutx 8mo ago
Terrible name, kind of a mid idea when you think about it (Self improving AI is literally what everyone's first thought is when building an AI), but still I like it.
154.
by falloutx 8mo ago
> We maybe witnessing the last generation of master software artisans like antirez What? He is mostly a AI influencer at this stage, even without getting paid for it (I think). There are always gonna be people writing code, people writin
155.
by falloutx 8mo ago
> But the shift is real. When Karpathy admits he barely writes code directly anymore, when the Claude Code team ships 20+ PRs daily with 100% AI-written code, we’re past the point of dismissing this as hype. Oh a company 100% invested in
156.
by falloutx 8mo ago
Claude code programmers are very open that they vibe code it.
157.
by falloutx 8mo ago
This is stupid and doesnt consider very few apps are made for automation. Apps are made for people to use and it wouldnt make sense to maintain an API for agents when 100% of the revenue is from people.
158.
by falloutx 8mo ago
At some point, writing 2 sentences by hand will become more acceptable than this.
159.
by falloutx 8mo ago
I coined the term lite coding for this after reading this article and now my chatGPT has convinced me that I am a genius
160.
by falloutx 8mo ago
May be a language issue but "Automatic" would imply something happening without any intervention. Also, I dont like that everyone is trying to coin a term for this but there is already a term called lite coding for this sort of a
161.
by falloutx 8mo ago
Guy who posted this is actually a VC (not sure how big).
162.
by falloutx 8mo ago
They change the name every day.
163.
by falloutx 8mo ago
Dont give them kudos, they are just trying to seem like a "research" company while submitting bogus papers on arXiv (not peer-reviewed)
164.
by falloutx 8mo ago
Can we ban Anthropic research papers to be submitted on HN? This study is so bad, the sample size is n = 52 and then in some conclusions it goes down to n = 2.
165.
by falloutx 8mo ago
People are gonna move to google anyway, because Google can keep the gravy train running for much much longer. OpenAI's business model is totally reckless while Google is a cash rich company.
166.
by falloutx 8mo ago
Why would anyone spend any money on the appstore?
167.
by falloutx 8mo ago
Progress is not always linear, Until it actually does it we can't say anything. This assumption is only peddled by AI companies to get the investments and is not a scientific assumption.
168.
by falloutx 8mo ago
Just another AI copies the entire project and you get to put your name on it.
169.
by falloutx 8mo ago
I was saying this yesterday, There will be people building good software somewhere, but chances to it happening in current corporate environment is nearing zero. Change is mostly in the management, and not in the Software Development itself
170.
by falloutx 9mo ago
why even pay for that, just use a free model from Opencode, most of them are pretty good for simple tasks. I haven't paid a cent in vibe coding for ages.
171.
by falloutx 9mo ago
you are never gonna hear back from Anthropic, they don't have any support. They are a company who feels like their model is AGI now they dont need humans except when it comes to paying.
172.
by falloutx 9mo ago
This tracks with Anthropic, they are actively hostile to security researchers.
173.
by falloutx 9mo ago
> People will forget what it was like to have authentic content. This is already true. Most people on the internet are stuck in tiktok loop anyway. Even chatgpt would struggle to get them. By the time LLMs get good enough, a lot of peopl
174.
by falloutx 9mo ago
> Example X giving $1M reward for the top Articles. Oh boy I can already see what kind of articles those would be.
175.
by falloutx 9mo ago
There may like 0.001% of the general population who would ever write a blog post, most of the LLM data in future would be fake blog posts used to trick LLMs or just spam.
176.
by falloutx 9mo ago
So if you can get a good LLM model locally in say 6 months, you may never pay for any subscriptions. Only companies will remain will be old behemoths whose software is contractually bought by other big enterprises. Other thing I have experi
177.
by falloutx 9mo ago
There may be low quality human slop but AI-slop is the most common slop on the internet.
178.
by falloutx 9mo ago
> As long as you're vetting your results this is just what AI companies say so they are not held responsibly for any legal issues, if a person is searching for summary of a paper, surely they don't have time to vet the paper.
179.
by falloutx 9mo ago
AI is not a great partner to code with. For me I just use it to do some boilerplates and fill in the tedious gaps. Even for translations its bad if you know both languages. The biggest issues is that AI constantly tries to steer you wrong,
180.
by falloutx 9mo ago
I think a lot more people, especially at the higher end of the pay scale, are in some kind of AI psychosis. I have heard people at work talk about how they are using chatGPT to quick health advice, some are asking it for gym advice and othe

More ›