fallentimes

10 ms·

91.
by fallentimes 17y ago
If Web 2.0 doesn't mean anything where does that leave Web 3.0. Web 2.0 was coined by a book publisher to sell more books. It's just marketing.
92.
by fallentimes 17y ago
"...OR HOWEVER U SPELL THE IDIOTS NAME" Maybe Facebook Video is next; they already have the Youtubesque comments.
93.
by fallentimes 17y ago
In the future, I plan to put up the deck we took to the VCs when we went seeking the Series A round. We received two term sheets from what anyone would call Tier 1 firms. That would be awesome. Thanks Brandon.
94.
by fallentimes 17y ago
Yeah I was more curious than anything. I don't really know what the definition of a startup is, but I know it's certainly different than a website. HN in general tends to have a very liberal definition of the word. Side projects that never
95.
by fallentimes 17y ago
9 startups or 9 websites?
96.
by fallentimes 17y ago
So really it should have been called Soft Times in the Porno Industry .
97.
by fallentimes 17y ago
I think it'd be really helpful for the readers for you to write about what you would change and why.
98.
by fallentimes 17y ago
Can you please explain?
99.
by fallentimes 17y ago
Care to share any stories?
100.
by fallentimes 17y ago
Their job is more selling news than reporting it.
101.
by fallentimes 17y ago
...and we sell your email address. Is that what you meant to write?
102.
by fallentimes 17y ago
You know...just because you were rejected once doesn't mean you're permanently rejected from YC. You can apply multiple times. IMHO you would have been much better off launching with a title describing what you do. If you prove to be a succ
103.
by fallentimes 17y ago
It's random.
104.
by fallentimes 17y ago
Oh sorry - I didn't see it. I'm surprised the original headline didn't receive more votes.
105.
by fallentimes 17y ago
The new models could look a lot like Politico: http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/wolff200...
106.
by fallentimes 17y ago
I love how the journalist originally treated the Gawker post as a badge of honor.
107.
by fallentimes 17y ago
I used the title tag (How Gawker Ripped Off My Newspaper Story) instead of the actual title (The Death of Journalism [Gawker Edition]) as I found the latter to be too sensationalistic.
108.
How Gawker Ripped Off My Newspaper Story(washingtonpost.com)
49 points by fallentimes 17y ago|32 comments
109.
In Harness(ryanholiday.net)
6 points by fallentimes 17y ago|0 comments
110.
by fallentimes 17y ago
When you need to consistently sue your customers to survive, you already know you're fucked. I can't even tell you how much I enjoy watching the RIAA slowly die. I hope they enjoy their skirmish wins because the war is already over.
111.
Politico’s Washington Coup(vanityfair.com)
4 points by fallentimes 17y ago|0 comments
112.
Why Buy The Milk When You Can Get the Cow for Free?(seobook.com)
2 points by fallentimes 17y ago|0 comments
113.
by fallentimes 17y ago
Just an upvote. You don't need to respond to every qualm or counterpoint if others do it for you.
114.
by fallentimes 17y ago
I love that picture: http://danhau.posterous.com/our-fearless-investor-paul-gra
115.
by fallentimes 17y ago
That's a straw man argument. Patrick didn't say there wasn't work involved.
116.
by fallentimes 17y ago
That's for broad match (e.g. youtube, youtube fights, download youtube videos, etc). Even still, exact match searches (i.e. just [youtube], no modifiers) are at 414 million per month, globally. Also for further insight, here's a percentage
117.
by fallentimes 17y ago
Beat me to it by a minute :).
118.
by fallentimes 17y ago
It does if you consider it JustIn.tv. There's nothing wrong with having a brand name that doesn't explicitly say what the company does (reminds me of the Forest Gump quote " We invested in some apple company "). Their site get millions of v
119.
by fallentimes 17y ago
Are you worried that because it didn't take long to create (and presumably has a small barrier to entry), that an influx of competitors will appear?
120.
by fallentimes 17y ago
This one was awkward: Likewise, calling Arrington names or making cheap innuendo about Lacy became boring before it even started, not just because either of them, or every other TechCrunch contributor past and present, could write and repo

More ›