fabioyy

8 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by fabioyy 6y ago

   and we killed
2. 32.▲
   by fabioyy 6y ago

   geocities!! ops. sorry, wrong century
3. 33.▲
   by fabioyy 6y ago

   smtp to smtp traffic still mostly unencripted.
4. 34.▲
   by fabioyy 6y ago

   you can only see any satellite when there is a sun reflection. ( sunset and sunrise )
5. 35.▲
   by fabioyy 6y ago

   Thank you Epic
6. 36.▲
   by fabioyy 6y ago

   my god, is slashdot still alive?
7. 37.▲
   by fabioyy 6y ago

   Most of the comments defending apple, are people thinking that epic games does not want pay the 30% cut... but the problem is not that.. the problem is that apple demands that the price must be equal on all points of sale. ( Epic should
8. 38.▲
   by fabioyy 6y ago

   I don't think you understood what apple does. apple is forbidding Epic Games to offer "discount" outside apple platform. the price must be equal on all points of sale.
9. 39.▲
   by fabioyy 6y ago

   i worked on a book store here in Brazil, and while we could sell ebooks on Apple plataform paying the 30% cut, apple did the same with ibooks... with lower price since they don't have to pay the 30% fee
10. 40.▲
    by fabioyy 6y ago

    agreed, every "new" implementation of apple hardware is cursed with bugs list of recalls: https://support.apple.com/en-asia/exchange_repair and there is a lot of bugs that apple don't even admit. (ex, gh
11. 41.▲
    by fabioyy 6y ago

    its a marketing move. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TfLVL5GeE4
12. 42.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    3$ for 350k request is VERY expensive
13. 43.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    Any issues using Catalina? mine shows Error: No YubiKey detected!
14. 44.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    RFC of http protocol allows body content on GET.
15. 45.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    Google is Tier 1, they don't pay bandwidth. no one can compete with them
16. 46.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    I've cut costs by an order of magnitude by changing back to old school dedicated servers. ( using the same data center that aws/google uses, equinix ) IOPS on aws is ridiculous expensive
17. 47.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    200-400 gigabit/s is not that huge.
18. 48.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    theses backdoors claims on a "new" brand that rivals in quality with apple... are suspicious.. why there is never a technical disclosure of the backdoors..
19. 49.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    any benchmarks?
20. 50.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    whats is more likely? one diver selling gold coins, or a huge conspiracy of >500 years
21. 51.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    hqtrivia
22. 52.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    packet size of webrtc(rtp) is VERY VERY VERY small, and since they are UDP, each individual packet must be encrypted. ( i can't just encode a big chunk of data and send to the network like tls ). in fact, for scaling a solution that u
23. 53.▲
    by fabioyy 7y ago

    The problem is that webrtc is a very intensive CPU ( each connection have its own encription ). How many users can this solution handle per server?
24. 54.▲
    by fabioyy 8y ago

    GRPC
25. 55.▲
    by fabioyy 8y ago

    Opening a conection and closing after a while is not very good example os "scalability" ... the kernel does the opening part... reply
26. 56.▲
    Ask HN: AWS Instances Performance

    1 points by fabioyy 8y ago|0 comments
27. 57.▲
    by fabioyy 8y ago

    Agree!! insanely high! If you use a lot of bandwidth, aws doen't make sense at all I'm getting 10x cheaper bandwidth solutions on bare metal, 8x cheaper on digital ocean
28. 58.▲
    by fabioyy 8y ago

    Plenty of people lived just fine without the industrial revolution, scientific method, cellphones, computers, fire...
29. 59.▲
    by fabioyy 10y ago

    Any news about APFS?
30. 60.▲
    by fabioyy 11y ago

    Fine WhatsApp? Really? In Another country, with another set of laws?! Because you see that where? any US lawers suing let me see.. any russian company?