fUCp62

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by fUCp62 2y ago

   Respectfully disagree. The sparse mention of alleged 1A violations is just how the pleading stage of pretrial litigation works. This pleading (Defendant's Answer to Complaint) serves to (among other things) (1) explicitly respond to ea
2. 2.▲
   by fUCp62 2y ago

   > The purpose of this project is not to restrict or ban the use of AI in articles, but to verify that its output is acceptable and constructive, and to fix or remove it otherwise. This policy position feels necessary, considering how tho
3. 3.▲
   by fUCp62 2y ago

   > possibly playing a game of "truth or dare" (Also not defending these laws/the decision there, but) I'm not sure why this is phrased as merely an allegation by the prosecution, since this is what transpired even by
4. 4.▲
   by fUCp62 2y ago

   Deeming a product with only ~65% market share as an antitrust issue feels wrong and reductive of actual market monopolies. I like Khan and what the FTC has been up to lately, but the contemporary antitrust school of thought feels diluted an