f33d5173

5 ms·

31.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Corporations are you. Corporations provide a service to individuals, often in exchange for money. Restricting corporations from doing something is the same as restricting people from receiving that as a service.
32.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
What percentage of the vote was required to join the EU? The EU effectively constitutes a relinquishment of sovereignty, but that's not how it was sold to citizens, they were told that they could leave at any time.
33.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
3000 years of philosophy, but fortunately you're here to tell us "war exists, so nothing can ever be bad or good".
34.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
> But your definition of processed foods has now shifted to being one of hyperpalitability and likelihood of overeating. that's a very small shift. the two are very closely linked > why have this proxy at all very simple reason:
35.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
"health" as quantity of nutrients doesn't really make sense. pretty much everything we eat is good in some quantities, and bad in others. so there's no nutrient that you can name that makes food unhealthy (there are some
36.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Ireland can claim that actually they'd rather it be gaelic. It has the perception of a colonizer language for them too.
37.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
CMS here not referring to content management system?
38.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
An index is an index. It works fine as an index if it excludes one or two stocks. People seem to forget as well that this is a question of waiting a single year before it including the stock. It is literally just long enough to make sure th
39.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
China is.
40.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Usually in a first amendment sense legal consequences specifically. More generally we would probably require freedom from physical harm by non state actors, freedom from employment consequences, etc. All of these are consequences which free
41.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
> Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences. "Freedom from consequences" is fundamentally what freedom is. Such a stupid slogan.
42.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
That has nothing to do with what we're talking about. We're discussing threats. Serious threats are made seriously.
43.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
I didn't see it mentioned that this hid ads. I would be surprised if it did, since facebook makes way more than $4/month off many of it's users, they would be leaving a ton of money on the table if they only charged that to r
44.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Unix has always had incredibly weak protections between users. You shouldn't rely on it as a security boundary. Think of it as a "keep honest users honest" protection. And llms are not honest.
45.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
No they wouldn't. A fundamental part of a threat is to make it very clear that there's a threat. The reason you threaten is to get some concession, otherwise you wouldn't bother threatening.
46.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
My current regex looks like this: ^(\w*)://www.reddit.com/(?!r/[^/]*/s/|media|gallery|notifications|appeals)(.\*) Mapping to $1://old.reddit.com/$2
47.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Here's the OSS users disclaimer: I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO COMPLAIN, WHINGE, CRITIQUE, GET MAD AT, OR OTHERWISE COMMENT ON ANY AND DECISIONS, COMMITS, PATCHES, MARKETING, OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BY THE PROJECT. THESE COMMENTS COME WTH NO
48.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Companies tend to comply with laws in the dumbest possible way just to be jackasses. If you want a company to release the server, write a law that says that. Otherwise, companies will find a way to comply with the law in the worst way possi
49.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
If it was only a small cluster of employees bottle pissing then this would make sense. When it's endemic across the company, that suggests it comes from incentives set at the top, and the low level managers can't individually do m
50.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Instead, the government does it themselves based on regular politics and moral stances.
51.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Yes, if you're going to bother to respond, you should use words, and not mere guttoral gestures like a cave man. I consider this an advancement of society and not a regression, but perhaps that's my particular bias.
52.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
It wasn't that long ago. Maybe someone stuck a thermometer down there.
53.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Are we doing "i just cant even" posting in 2026? Wastewater is not expected to be safe as drinking water, so it meeting the standards for drinking water shows how safe it is. If you have a reasonable argument to the contrary then
54.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
It's not something you need to complete. A bullet train is worthless if you don't make an entire line. A bullet bus is just an upgrade to an existing bus route. Suppose you create a busway, but never manage to get the buses on it
55.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
That appears to be a long winded description of extortion under the cover of insurance, like the gp said
56.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Until they added it, you didn't need it, then suddenly a phone was unusable without it.
57.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
The clouds are not really american, but they are subject to american laws. The money and ownership needn't be american, anybody all around the world can buy stock in america companies. And the work to build these clouds was not done ex
58.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
To your point 1, they claimed to have been using fedora on their most recent attempt.
59.
by f33d5173 4mo ago
Tried clicking the fivethirtyeight link halfway down the article, and was immediately reminded of what abc decided to start doing today. What an asshole move.
60.
by f33d5173 5mo ago
Only to the kernel. And only if they patched it. Kernel modules don't count as patches. This is how myriad android vendors get out of providing source. But no, the switch doesn't use linux afaik.

More ›