f0urtyfive

4 ms·

1.
by f0urtyfive 10y ago
Woah there horsey, you're basically sticking anyone that thinks reactionless drive might be possible into the crazy conspiracy theory category, and there are plenty of people that are interested in honest reproducible research on the t
2.
by f0urtyfive 10y ago
Who said the text persists, you could take it off the phone and type it in to compare against any existing salted hash. Still not good security, but not necessarily stored in plaintext.
3.
by f0urtyfive 10y ago
Why wouldn't you use redundant switches rather than n(2) servers?
4.
by f0urtyfive 10y ago
Once you're planning work arounds for the "assume half your servers fail" scenario, I think it's time to admit that eventually, something is going to go down that is not automatically recoverable.
5.
by f0urtyfive 10y ago
I'm not him, but it looks like their curriculum is licensed in the github repo under "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License", which according to this: https://creativecommons.org&
6.
by f0urtyfive 10y ago
> Uber and Lyft simply don't want to do this because it threatens their profit margins. You do understand how silly that sounds right? They want to protect their profit margins because... they're businesses! Uber and Lyft both
7.
by f0urtyfive 10y ago
The Austin City council members that promoted the ban had received campaign contributions from the Texas Taxi Lobby. It was never about having verified names, it was about making money for Taxis.
8.
by f0urtyfive 11y ago
That's already a thing, Google GPS based NTP servers with a TCXO or Rubidium reference. You can buy one for ~2000$ that will use GPS, or Cellular as a time reference, and can add options like a Temperature controlled crystal oscillator