ezrahoch

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ezrahoch 10y ago

   It is not an open-source project, but rather a proprietary implementation.
2. 2.▲
   by ezrahoch 10y ago

   1) Keeping a log mechanism per bucket would be expensive, since it is a heavy mechanism. It will cost memory & network traffic. The additional information needed by Bizur for a bucket is minimal, basically, just a version. 2) In Bizur,
3. 3.▲
   by ezrahoch 10y ago

   Indeed, it is a tradeoff, and our solution doesn't require consistency across multiple keys. More generally, any solution that doesn't require transactions across multiple keys, can use Bizur instead of classical Paxos, and achiev
4. 4.▲
   by ezrahoch 10y ago

   Very nice work! Indeed we've done similar stuff :) I haven't read it all yet, I'll comment back once I do.
5. 5.▲
   by ezrahoch 10y ago

   One of the differences between a raft group and a bizur bucket is the granularity and the overhead of that granularity. Bizur buckets can be very small (10s of kb), and the overhead for them is minimal (10s of bytes). What would be the over
6. 6.▲
   by ezrahoch 10y ago

   Single decree is a write-once algorithm. You can't use the same instance again, for another update of the associated value. So just replacing bizur' should "register" implementation with a single decree paxos won't