eyeing_see

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by eyeing_see 8y ago

   These cars are driving on public roads, so the question is not whether the user is informed but whether they are compliant. It doesn't take many ignored beeps to learn that a particular customer is not using the feature as intended, an
2. 2.▲
   by eyeing_see 9y ago

   Which safeguards are implemented to detect that rotation and modulation are taking place as intended?
3. 3.▲
   by eyeing_see 9y ago

   To add to your comment: GM's SuperCruise semi-autonomous mode uses a real-time head and eye-tracking system to ensure the driver is alert. I don't know if it's based on DL, but it's available in a production vehicle.
4. 4.▲
   by eyeing_see 9y ago

   On top of that, I think it is absolutely rational to expect autonomous cars to perform at the current state of the art. We tolerate certain kinds of bad human drivers, like beginners, because there is hardly an alternative. A self-driving c
5. 5.▲
   by eyeing_see 9y ago

   And due to human vision being better than a dashcam, this car's emergency-assist system, the safety driver, could probably have caught this as well, if they had paid attention to the road. Which is something that that production-grade
6. 6.▲
   by eyeing_see 9y ago

   It seems pitch black on a video, but human vision is much better in low light. You may have had way more time to react.
7. 7.▲
   by eyeing_see 9y ago

   I think the point GP was making is that an attentive human driver may have been able to see the pedestrian much earlier than when she becomes visible on the video.