extr

6 ms·

61.
by extr 5mo ago
What does your usage look like day to day? Are you using a low level amount all day long? I'm with the others here, I've never hit the weekly limit ever, only the hourly, and I consider myself a heavy user.
62.
by extr 6mo ago
Seems like a continuation of the current meta where GPT models are better in GPT-like ways and Claude models are better in Claude-like ways, with the differences between each slightly narrowing with each generation. 5.5 is noticeably better
63.
by extr 6mo ago
> Most things are sold as commodities without limits or re-use. This is somehow doubly wrong. Not only are most economic goods NOT commodities, there are plenty of economic analogs to AI subscriptions (streaming, telecom, gyms, buffets)
64.
by extr 6mo ago
I'm not sure they have "officially" said anything but they do allow Codex OAuth login for 3rd party coding agents: pi, opencode, etc. Employees on twitter have explicitly approved this.
65.
by extr 6mo ago
I mean surely you can understand the the difficulty of their position, right? It's as if Waymo offered a subsidized, subscription based plan that models a certain type of ridership as typical but then people start scheduling rides on a
66.
by extr 6mo ago
Yes same here. I use CC almost constantly every day for months across personal and work max/team accounts, as well as directly via API on google vertex. I have hardly ever noticed an issue (aside from occasional outages/capacity i
67.
by extr 6mo ago
I don't think it's conscious or even a result of not caring about UX/DX. But I do think you're right - I've noticed the loudest voices in their Issue queue are people wanting things like better vim support, helix ke
68.
by extr 6mo ago
I think you are kidding if you think you are going to be remotely approximately the quantity/quality of output you get from a $100/max sub with Zed/Openrouter. I easily get $1K+ of usage out of my $100 max sub. And that'
69.
by extr 6mo ago
I actually find Zed pretty reasonable in terms of memory usage. But yeah, like you say, there are lots of small UX/DX papercuts that are just unfortunate. In some cases I'm not sure it's even Zed's fault, it's just
70.
by extr 6mo ago
I think explicit post-training is going to be needed to make this kind of approach effective. As this repo notes is "The secret to good memory isn't remembering more. It's knowing what to forget." But knowing what is lik
71.
by extr 6mo ago
What is Cursor doing? They need to relax a little bit. Recently I saw they released "Glass" which WAS here: https://cursor.com/glass , now just redirects to /download. Is "Cursor 3" == Glass? I get t
72.
by extr 6mo ago
Sure, and that is the real tragedy here. The person I'm replying to is just pointing out that native support for high res sucks, which is true, but the real problem is what limits there are on 3rd party support.
73.
by extr 6mo ago
Just emailed him. Ridiculous issue.
74.
by extr 6mo ago
Disagree completely. Works great for me.
75.
by extr 6mo ago
If you actually care about this stuff you are going to run something like https://github.com/waydabber/BetterDisplay which easily allows for HiDPI @ 4K resolution, it does not "look bizarre" or "require
76.
by extr 7mo ago
Dario Amodei @ 18:05 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcqQ1ebBqkc&t=1088s
77.
by extr 7mo ago
It's widely reported and acknowledged as true.
78.
by extr 7mo ago
> If it wasn't the case, the Claude API pricing would be the same, $200 for unlimited use. How do you figure? That doesn't make any sense to me.
79.
by extr 7mo ago
K2.5 is dog shit compared to leading OAI/Ant models.
80.
by extr 7mo ago
I think frankly OpenCode is delusional to think that Anthropic is actually "concerned" with them in any way. Anthropic's concerns at this point are on the geopolitical level. I doubt stamping out ToS-violating usage of their
81.
by extr 7mo ago
Why does Netflix care how the movies they stream to you are consumed? Shouldn't your $8/mo allow you to stream any movie to OpenFlix and consume however you like?
82.
by extr 7mo ago
Is this what the legal request demanded or is this just something that OpenCode is doing out of spite? Seems unclear. To me the meat of this change is that they're removing support for `opencode-anthropic-auth` and the prompt text that
83.
by extr 7mo ago
Ever since the shutdown of the side-load they've been pretty vocally anti-anthropic on twitter. Paranoid that anthropic is going to torpedo them via some backdoor now that they own bun, insinuating that anthropic shut down the auth fro
84.
by extr 7mo ago
The OpenCode guys have really surprised me in the way they've reacted to Anthropic shutting down the side-loaded auth scheme. Very petty and bitter. It's clearly just a business decision from Anthropic and a rational one at that,
85.
by extr 7mo ago
LLM generated article.
86.
by extr 7mo ago
I mean, this completely falls apart when you're trying to do something "real". I am building a trading engine right now with Claude/Codex. I have not written a line of code myself. However I care deeply about making sure
87.
by extr 7mo ago
The control plane is already operational and does what I need. Copying public designs solved a few problems I didn't even know I had (awkward command and control UX) and seems strictly superior to what I had before. I could have taken
88.
by extr 7mo ago
Wow, quite surprising results. I have been working on a personal project with the astral stack (uv, ruff, ty) that's using extremely strict lint/type checking settings, you could call it an experiment in setting up a python codeba
89.
by extr 7mo ago
Thinking in terms of a "speed up multiplier" undersells it completely. The speed up on a task I would have never even attempted is infinite. For my +3000 PR recently on my polymarket engine control plane, I had no idea how these t
90.
by extr 7mo ago
Fair, that's optimistic, and it depends what you're doing. Looking at a personal project I had a PR from this week at +3000 -500 that I feel quite good about, took about 2 nights of about an hour each session to shape it into what

More ›