Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
extheat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
The DOE (as a research agency) does a lot of biological and genomic research and is well qualified to do this kind of research, as other comments here have pointed out. It's not uncommon for researchers in different agencies to collabo
92.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
> The other thing that gets me is the Energy Department said this back in 2021. There's since been a bunch of additional research done -- swabs in the market, cases traced back to points of origin -- that at least make the "mar
93.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
The Energy Department is far more credible than spy agencies as they actually do biological and genomic research.
94.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
With the nice addition of banner ads.
95.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
When you have legislators chasing buzzwords and clout, you get a lot of grandstanding from them. They don’t understand the tech, which doesn’t really matter to them. What matters is they get to say they did something to protect the people.
96.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
$30k seems grotesquely high, although I do agree with the point. I'm not sure how much of it is to do with supply vs demand (there being a lesser quantity of software engineers experienced in capable of making apps vs plumbers) and how
97.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
And what is knowledge? It could very well be that our minds are themselves fancy autocompletes.
98.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
While that may hypothetically be the future, that time is not now. The case before the court is much more consequential in nature and may remove the need for partnerships between companies like OpenAI and ShutterShock for consenstual sharin
99.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Copyrighted content on the internet isn't a free for all for people to train models with. No matter the good intentions, if Stability AI didn't take reasonable steps to remove copyrighted data from the training set then IMO they h
100.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
I agree, the shell changes are a big step backwards for the sake of some eye candy. Personally I use ExplorerPatcher [1] to restore most of the shell UI back to stock Win10, and it's been working pretty well for me without any problems
101.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Growing interest rates propagate throughout the economy. The goal of higher interest rates (aside from debt & borrowing becoming substantially more expensive) is to bring down demand and slow the economy.
102.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
It's not wrong. The Fed is explicitly asking for these kinds of layoffs. The fact that they are seeing more layoffs in tech opposed to other industries is part of why the interest rate hikes aren't stopping.
103.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
While I normally would argue about virtue signaling, this seems like creepy and unsettling behavior that definitely warrants an investigation. That doesn’t mean there was any rule breaking, but this is one of those creepy things that I stro
104.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Is it actually “removed” globally or is it just blocked from viewing in India? This would be a big deal if it’s the former.
105.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Except we’re talking about photons…
106.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
How is working at Apple like?
107.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
For one, commiting project dependencies into your SCM can go along way. Treat 3P code as your code. Not only does this help prevent supply chain attacks, but it makes you more conscious as to the stuff you’re importing. Maybe you don’t need
108.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Hence why I said silently. If I’m posting something and it appears to me as usual on my feed but not others, by all means that’s a shadow ban.
109.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Well if you are silently placed on a hide list (by manual human intervention without you being able to know without a third party), then by all means that is a shadow ban. Edit for clarity.
110.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Most importantly platforms like RN substantially lower the barrier to entry for making mobile apps, and cross platform ones at that. Whenever you lower the barrier to entry to something you inevitably attract low quality, low effort content
111.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Do you deploy confidential information into the repo ? That would be the root problem.
112.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Yep, it seems like most of the posters here in this thread don’t do much software engineering from the looks of it. Or are being purposely obtuse here. There is no security vulnerability here in any of the links we’ve seen so far minus some
113.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
What makes you think that there is some "substantial risk"? You seem to be mixing together git repos and site deployment rules. I don't see the big deal here with some CMS leftovers being deployed, but yes from a perspective
114.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Your mainstream user doesn’t care about the underlying technology behind a product. They care about good UX/UI, good content, who’s on it and a supply of dopamine to keep the “must check social media” cycle going. There’s a separate gr
115.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
The i-line of products was already well known by the general public at the time to be synonymous with Apple. iTunes, iPod, iPhone ... those were normal english words prefixed with an "i". People wonder why Apple didn't call t
116.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
> Has global recession started Long ago. It's going to get worse before it gets any better, IMO. Companies have to be forward looking, not backward or just present looking. If there's tough times ahead, you want to be ahead of,
117.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
“Better software engineers” to anyone who does software engineering is a joke. It’s an totally unquantifiable measure, and some people use dumb metrics like leetcode capabilities as some IQ test.
118.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
Seems like this is commentary rather than news.
119.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
All sorts of software can be used to “generate potentially harmful results”. Think about an algorithm for displaying content on social media sites, a search engine, a piece of malware on a computer. Do we ban books on how to make bombs? It’
120.
▲
by
extheat
4y ago
There is no singular best answer. Nuclear fission for the foreseeable future will remain one of the solutions. There is the caveat that it’s not technically “sustainable” or “renewable”, but practically no source of energy is fully.
More ›