Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
exikyut
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
69 ms
·
631.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
> there was a goto command which was implemented by seeking on the shell-script file descriptor rather than as a shell builtin, for example. Oh noooo I just realized you could probably implement a shared library loadable module for bas
632.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
I think "sell the HP-35 for 3.14 × cost of materials" cool-HP became Agilent, right? If I wanted to follow the trail of awesomeness what forest should I be sticking my nose to the ground in? :)
633.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
I have nothing to contribute except "this is exceptionally well done" so I'll just add the TGM invisible Tetris video I watch occasionally to boggle at: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lE_UHhqAd1c (Yup, still fee
634.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
Sorry to hear the finger flick doesn't work :(. TIL about dewaxing (why anybody would even think that would help...). Sound targeting is IMO something only worth doing in an especially-exotic clinical setting in particular - like fMRI
635.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
(FWIW: The Blackhat link elsewhere in the thread clarifies that the root-of-trust feature is new in Gen10/ILO5. I don't know a good source to cite, but it sounds plausible that ILO<=4 might not use 202x-vintage secure boot. Not
636.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
I empathize and relate. Out of curiosity, were you actually handling each WebSocket connection using an independent PHP-FPM instance? If so (wow), how many concurrent connections did you manage to sustain at peak? The only experience I'
637.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
SecureROM in the iPhone 6 didn't properly configure the MMU before initialising the NAND, so it turned out to be possible to interpose between the NVME controller and main CPU (which had just started using PCI-e fabric for I/O, II
638.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
So what'd The Internet People™ do to it, exactly? DDoS the WebSocket server? Write Very Bad URLs? Worse? :( I wanted to see. Not fair, takers away of nice things. >:/
639.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
WebSockets in PHP huh? That's a pretty cool approach, although it naturally scales terribly (sadly D:).
640.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
Hmm, that's a pretty powerful proof-of-work mechanic you've got there. "DefragCoin", anyone? Now we just need a way to achieve unilateral consensus about whether a given HDD is dead... (/s)
641.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
That would be untenable - I wouldn't be able to cleanly `gcc -o blah blah.c` without making an explicit decision, and by extension wouldn't be able to (continue to) compile existing code either. Rebuilds on every codebase everywhe
642.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
T: I'm curious if you ever listened to exceptionally loud sounds at or near the problem frequencies either once-off or over an extended period of time. I also wonder if/how well the technique where you put your hands over your ear
643.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
Demo videos and overview: https://alexyu.net/plenoxels/
644.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
That's kinda getting into sequencer territory, but also sounds fun.
645.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
(Psst, that was >2000 years ago. He's ∞+2k years older now. Agree with everything else.)
646.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
But you're still trying, and deep down you want to keep trying. So listen to that, even though it feels stupid because it isn't working.
647.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
There's a lot of very interesting information here that only prompts further curiosity. Music sounds important to you. How impactful is the hearing damage you speak of? Why can't you use power tools? Are they unbearably loud to us
648.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
O.o I was debating pulling my phone out wondering if playing with multitouch would be worth it, but definitely had to double check after reading this. Yep, this version doesn't support multitouch! Can only agree that would be much much
649.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
> I’m not familiar with [Zig] or its Windows API interop Incidentally dealing with very interesting complexity: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29610302 (from a couple days ago) The issue honestly reads like a Rus
650.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
I've only experienced the dictatorial context of Chrome on Android, so would never have fathomed something like this would ever pass policy. Hence I didn't quite pay proper attention to the copy on the website, which does note tha
651.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
The GP comment is an app for macOS. Do you know of any good, reputable blockers for iOS?
652.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
TIL the number represents how many times an app has been (re)downloaded, not how many active users it has! Makes perfect sense really... especially considering it's so easy to assume "downloads" = "users"...
653.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
And admittedly it would have qualified "this is only a server and doesn't come with a client" too. Ah well.
654.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
Very useful to know. Thanks for the reply!
655.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
That's a very good distinction, which my previous comment didn't really properly consider. Completely agree there.
656.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
(I was idly curious. It appears this data is available as part of the ~US$280/mo tier, along with a bunch of other things.)
657.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
(Which was about AWS being down?)
658.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
* Makes this a tiny support ticket * :) A bit of cursory googling around for that error didn't find anything particularly insightful, surprisingly. Most of the references were extremely obscure. The only consistent theme I saw was &quo
659.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
aaaaaaAAAAAA𝗔𝗔𝘼𝘼𝘼𝘼𝒜𝒜𝒜ΛΛΛ
660.
▲
by
exikyut
5y ago
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2017/08/15/tell-em/
More ›