Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
exclusiv
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
62 ms
·
511.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
From the article: "If hunger had an effect on our mental resources of this magnitude, our society would fall into minor chaos every day at 11:45 a.m." This looks compelling at first but how many people are really making any consid
512.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
Is your problem more with the lack of proper migration to Angular 2 or with the differences between 1 and 2?
513.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
Yeah further down they note: "We only try to partner with high quality companies. For example this Tokyo one were running right now is with journy, ProductHunt, theSkimm, The Wirecutter, and Conde Nast Traveler" I looked at theSki
514.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
> Their employer has 0% loyalty to them. Their employer would stab them in the throat for 50 cents. You don't know that. The fact that he's asking this question means he thinks they have more than 0% loyalty. If you knew they h
515.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
Ok I think that's fair and we're actually in alignment. Thanks for the well thought out response.
516.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
So you twist it to high consumption levels. What about moderate recreational usage as the parent suggested?
517.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
See my newer study above that refutes your old one. I'm not refuting the negative side effects of alcohol. I'm disputing your ridiculous claim that alcohol has zero benefits over water. No you don't give it to a child (illega
518.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
That doesn't prove I'm wrong. From your study: > In summary, we report intriguing associations between the intake of fluids and the risk of coronary heart disease that are not obviously explained by confounding. Further researc
519.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
> There are more cost inputs than just labor Labor is usually the #1 cost for most businesses. Many businesses have slim margins already. The average net profit margin for privately held companies across all industries was 8.6%, manufact
520.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
Oh yes I see now. I shouldn't have written everything as I mentioned that foregoing profit is an option too. Thanks for clarifying. > in a competitive market the salary increases would not be passed on to the consumer but would come
521.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
That's a good insight. I agree with that point and think every city should propose laws that support a living wage. We just need to understand what that living wage should be in any given city and consider a variety of factors, some sh
522.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
I mentioned it could come from the profit too. If you're a business owner you can forego your margins to account for added costs and run it the exact same. Some businesses like cosmetics have a lot of room to play with. Some don't
523.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
I don't think that's an accurate statement. I think it's more about what level is optimal for an area and how we determine it.
524.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
True. It almost seems that science and research as a whole is increasingly just a channel for pushing an agenda. I don't think we've advanced much in that regard. Anyone can fund a study and twist it to support their agenda or jus
525.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
Some considerations of the minimum wage movement: 1) The higher it gets the more likely and quicker the minimum wage jobs will be replaced by AI/robots/automation. 2) The cost gets passed on to the consumer. So if everything costs
526.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
Seriously. If a restaurant cannot pay a fair wage they shouldn't exist.
527.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
Makes sense. I have a contractor for one of my companies that I pay $20/hr for doing mostly CMS edits. She's been pressuring me for more hours. We asked her to get more acquainted with Snapchat and other things to get more hours b
528.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
The parent asked you to compare it to alcoholic drinks, not compare it with lower intake of itself.
529.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
> There's no point in considering criteria that cannot be quantified. Sure there is. You claimed that alcohol has no benefits over water. We don't need to quantify absolutely everything to dispute that absurd claim, but point o
530.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
> The reality is this: alcohol is worse than water and alcohol is bad for you. Except if you're at risk of cardiovascular disease as I mentioned. Water cannot save you there. Why can't you agree? You're ignoring every oppo
531.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
I don't need to cite the studies about harm from alcohol. I was disputing your claim that "drinking has no benefits compared to water. period" You're clearly wrong on that.
532.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
> drinking has no benefits compared to water. period. "Resveratrol (RSV), a red wine component, and red wine itself exert cardio- and nephroprotective effects by modulating the Nitric Oxide system (NO). Elucidating both upstream and
533.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
They probably did cigarettes on the company tab back in the day. The difference is, cigarettes don't make a company event more fun and most places have laws or bans on smoking indoors. Cigarette smoke is also very obnoxious, gets on an
534.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
> 2 drinks/night is practically getting drunk/tipsy every night Maybe if you hammer the 2 drinks and you weigh 100 pounds. But 2 drinks with a normal drinking pace will not get most people tipsy or remotely drunk. I would guess
535.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
Yeah Trump didn't drive a women off a bridge and leave her dead like your previous leader Ted Kennedy. I personally support third party but damn the left loves to ignore how dirtball their own party is. Add Mel Reynolds, Robert KKK Byr
536.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
Yeah if you are providing ample resistance then I don't think you need 2 hands to resolve the tests. You won't even get test to my knowledge in that scenario.
537.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
I think this will happen but the article talks about robots replacing humans because of how great they are and then mentions unimpressive results. Maybe it's a wash but the robots win because they don't take 20 pct of profits. So
538.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
It's logical from a financial perspective for many people. When I think of older first time parents I think 30+. In the past upper 20s might be considered older because people would get married in young 20s and have children shortly af
539.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
If the market is confused about the term and it's not clear in practice - it's still not a good term to use. I definitely think it's worse than cruise control as you suggest. Cruise control systems control your cruising speed
540.
▲
by
exclusiv
9y ago
Sorry I edited my comment. Which part are you referring to?
More ›