ewofwkweoifd

4 ms·

1.
by ewofwkweoifd 11y ago
I guess in my experience people use the word race to mean any one of subspecies, cluster, or culture. Generally speaking, the biologists and the pro-genocide / pro-segregation people mean subspecies, the non-biologist geeks mean clust
2.
by ewofwkweoifd 11y ago
Yeah I think it's primarily intelligence. (Although I've read only a tiny portion.) Odd in a way, because the physical attributes are easier to argue and test. My guess is that Moldbug would rather shoot for him being smarter b
3.
by ewofwkweoifd 11y ago
You are racist iff you believe races exist or should exist. If you are using the word race to denote cluster even though you know better, you are being irresponsible on purpose and I consider you a racist in the "races should exist&qu
4.
by ewofwkweoifd 11y ago
Either person B or C, depending on whether or not they are enforcing laws for the government. Possibly person A depending on what was said I suppose (e.g. if it's new legislation).
5.
by ewofwkweoifd 11y ago
I get the IQ argument and agree. Thanks for the elaboration. The problem I have is that population groups aren't races, even if you're talking about sickle cell anemia. "Black" is not a subspecies of human. And becaus
6.
by ewofwkweoifd 11y ago
His whole deal is genetics, it's the core of his argument. But if you read it carefully you notice all this rhetorical sleight of hand. The guy is one of the most transparently disingenuous writers I've ever encountered. I feel
7.
by ewofwkweoifd 11y ago
My understanding is as follows. The root problem is that merely identifying races on a genetic basis is racist. If you believe that the race of a human refers to anything more than a social / ethnic / cultural construct, you are