evol262

11 ms·

31.
by evol262 4y ago
What's your daily caloric intake, though? It's not just sugar that's negative. Traditional diets which are high in either carbohydrates or fats are broadly ok, it's the combination which is problematic, because it&#x27
32.
by evol262 4y ago
I would, too, but the barrier to entry is much higher. This has been discussed ad-nauseum, but "getting started" with nix (or home-manager, or devshell) is an experience worse than trying to do anything with Linux in 2005. Cobblin
33.
by evol262 4y ago
Let me know when eBPF can probe into ring-1 hypercalls into a different kernel other than generically watching timing from vm_enter and vm_exit. Yes, there is a difference between "eBPF can probe what is happening in L0 of the host ker
34.
by evol262 4y ago
Bringing the features of one to the other is exactly what microvms means.
35.
by evol262 4y ago
Virtualization is not just "perceived" security over containerization. From CPU rings on down, it offers dramatically more isolation for security than containerization does. This isn't about 'what most users care' a
36.
by evol262 4y ago
> I doubt it. High standards are rare in journalism, most will go along with high profile figures if it serves their own interests. The debasement of "journalism" to the point where it applies to Joe Rogan and/or "new
37.
by evol262 4y ago
> Do you think you would get his 11-12 million listeners to agree with you on what society should expect? Who gets to decide that? I'm not sure why you presume that "we, as society, should expect better" means "this a
38.
by evol262 4y ago
[flagged]
39.
by evol262 4y ago
Kind of the thing with being in mass media with an enormous audience is that you lose the ability to just do what you've always been doing. I mean, he can, by abandoning his platform and starting over with something else, but the piles
40.
by evol262 4y ago
Ronnie was never less than 1% body fat, or even 1%. Stage ready bodybuilders are more like 3-5%. People are just poor at estimating bodyfat, and the media throwing out nonsense numbers doesn't help.
41.
by evol262 4y ago
> You can't imagine there are a few million people like that out of the billions in the world, and that we might want to give effective medical care to those people also? There's not a good reason to think that those people are
42.
by evol262 4y ago
> Then my father is irrelevant, being diagnosed with prediabetes at 6', 165lb. BMI is a population-level metric, and population-level analyses of health risks, from an epidemiological perspective to inform healthcare providers and p
43.
by evol262 4y ago
> it's saying that high BMI as a cause of premature death is likely just a proxy for high fasting insulin and inflammation and is not _by itself_ life shortening. No, it is not. We should be very clear that high BMI is, in fact, lif
44.
by evol262 4y ago
The percentage of people with normal BMIs and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes is so small that is irrelevant from a mass health perspective. There are a plethora of studies correlating a change in diet with improved blood markers for fasting
45.
by evol262 4y ago
There aren't people who are fat from salads, except for the loosest definition of the word. Weight gain is caused by an overconsumption of calories, barring a narrow range of medication side effects. Insulin tells your body to uptake g
46.
by evol262 4y ago
No, really. Insulin resistance and elevated fasted blood are clinical markers of diabetes and prediabetes. There is no arguing this. Yes, non-obese individuals with type 2 diabetes exist, though they are rare. Obese individuals who are not
47.
by evol262 4y ago
It means that you aren't insulin resistant and it actually does its job.
48.
by evol262 4y ago
Key takeaway: higher fasting insulin and higher fasting blood sugar are both signs of being prediabetic or having type 2 diabetes, which is correlated with obesity. This takeaway is basically "the increase in mortality that has been at
49.
by evol262 4y ago
> There was an article a while ago that said that American history since the civil war made much more sense if you assumed the South won, and made a reasonable case for them actually winning the peace, even if they technically lost the w
50.
by evol262 4y ago
> According to Louie Simmons, strength athlete at top shape can lose about 20% of 1RM weight in two weeks of inactivity. Westside was a very specific training methodology, and neurological adaptations matter, and Louie cared a lot more a
51.
by evol262 4y ago
It still makes a .idea folder to add to .gitignore or clean up, just as .vscode makes a .vscode folder. I don't see this as a lot different than MacOS spraying .DS_STORE files everywhere. It's not a big deal to add to .gitignore,
52.
by evol262 4y ago
I'm not suggesting cloudflare or public cloud by any means. It is not hard to run your own infrastructure on a small scale. However, you can play around with k8s/k3s without making it the lynchpin of the network infrastructure.
53.
by evol262 4y ago
This is a great idea, but the author is making a mistake (well, "all eggs in the k8s/k3s basket is also a mistake") in banking on CoreDNS. BIND is THE reference DNS server. It is the RFC, and the k8s external-dns sig to dyn
54.
by evol262 4y ago
Deploying them is easy. Figuring out the correct incantations to bind a load balancer or ingress port to redis/kafka/mysql/whatever and/or expose them in some way other than "let the ingress figure out the host from
55.
by evol262 4y ago
No, the point of this study is "those who claimed they reduced caloric intake but did not lose weight did not actually reduce it -- they're poor at estimations, so they got it wrong, and this actually works".
56.
by evol262 4y ago
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1454084/
57.
by evol262 4y ago
"What is glycemic index?" This isn't "crank science". This is just lack of knowledge. High fibre "carbs" have a lower glycemic index. Fats have essentially none, and protein is low. Food -> glucose -&gt
58.
by evol262 4y ago
Track how many calories you are eating. If your weight is stable, you are burning that many. It is literally that simple. If you reduce calories, you will lose weight. If you increase them, you will gain weight. Individual metabolism makes
59.
by evol262 4y ago
There are essentially zero papers which show anything even remotely resembling this. In basically every controlled environment, CICO more or less works, albeit not with perfect efficiency. It's not until prolonged starvation periods or
60.
by evol262 4y ago
It's almost like your body has a bunch of internal processes to maintain homeostasis around crucial functions, and maintaining the appropriate osmotic pressure is essential to life. Yes, this feedback loop has a little lag, so you can

More ›