eviks

30 ms·

391.
by eviks 7mo ago
Do you understand that you can't redirect the question addressed to you to the devs if that question questions your own statement by pointing out that some important details are not attended to?
392.
by eviks 7mo ago
That's not the reason, it's mainly because the current awful interface is a distinguished mark of pride, so there is a noticeable resistance to changing that, so it's easier to not change
393.
by eviks 7mo ago
Did the "attention to detail" phrase come from devs or you?
394.
by eviks 7mo ago
Does it leak your IP like the Mac version? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35363343 > Little Snitch for Linux is not a security tool. Maybe not? > Its focus is privacy: Or maybe yes?
395.
by eviks 7mo ago
Is there a plan for this to compete the experiment any time (soon)?
396.
by eviks 7mo ago
But since this is a declarative framework, it gives you the very best of two worlds with only rust?
397.
by eviks 7mo ago
Yes, in a "never_do_this_or_you_will_be_fired" kind of way
398.
by eviks 7mo ago
Thanks, how large of a size? And at lower sizes, what's the performance/quality like? Is this the silver bullet?
399.
by eviks 7mo ago
That's not an insider, that's a person with information
400.
by eviks 7mo ago
How many of 500 tests were actually reviewed/tested and found good? The code review results were: don't understand code and/or it's pretty bad. Then 0 of those 500 tests were used due to the full rewrite. So nothing to e
401.
by eviks 7mo ago
Your third example seems to generate 2G of data at runtime, so misleadingly minimalistic
402.
by eviks 7mo ago
> all contribute massively to software “bloat”. Could you point to an example where those gigs were really "massively" due crash handling and bounds checks etc?
403.
by eviks 7mo ago
The visual examples are rather misleading: The "2 * x" is rather - why would the reaction from a change in X display many gradual increments of 1 instead of showing the final value once? And then why does Z =Y+1 instead of +1 to Y
404.
by eviks 7mo ago
> Same architecture, native performance ... Goal: 200mb RAM usage. But Tauri doesn't have native performance, specifically when it comes to RAM! > Memory benchmark might be incorrect: Tauri might consume more RAM than Electron &g
405.
by eviks 7mo ago
Who is the "insider" here?
406.
by eviks 7mo ago
I don't, it's not simple for the user - you can't just pick one and forget the other or you'll end you wondering why your use of the other for regular text.l suddenly broke your whole paragraph because you didn't cl
407.
by eviks 7mo ago
> spent weeks in the early days following AI down dead ends, exploring designs that felt productive in the moment but collapsed under scrutiny > I paid for that with a total rewrite. With so much waste and not a single example of the
408.
by eviks 7mo ago
Easiest people to understand: someone hurt you (in this case disrupted your workflow, especially if pointlessly like this user thinks), you express the dissatisfaction to the person who did.
409.
by eviks 7mo ago
Hosting an event isn't gambling, why are you conflating those?
410.
by eviks 7mo ago
> easily decide to insert text inside or outside the styled region. Only for the 3 primitive styles that were supported? 3 table cells of RedBold GreenLowerCaps BlueUnderlineItalic isn't easy anymore But also - there wasn't a s
411.
by eviks 7mo ago
> So you can still see the actual text that you're editing But you're not editing that text! You're editing some other text and see a bunch of asterisks all over the place. And this is especially bad in nested styles - try
412.
by eviks 7mo ago
too little (preserves weird whitespace semantics requiring extra newlines, non-obvious _under_ for /italics/ markers, confusing multitude of link syntax, too many and too few list markers (why isn't • allowed?) too late? But
413.
by eviks 7mo ago
This also misses the point: multiple syntax markers for the same thing is the opposite of simplicity (though that's not the reason why Markdown will fail)
414.
by eviks 7mo ago
Do you enable visibility of tab and space?
415.
by eviks 7mo ago
> That's all, save for two extra newlines And save for two extra words and 5 extra symbols, which in many cases (like config files) draw out the actual content > XML is a) exactly what you need and b) as precise as you need it, S
416.
by eviks 7mo ago
> It should turn bold but keep the asterisk displayed so you can still edit as normal. This is just terrible UI, why do you need garbage marks when you already have bold? And you can edit "as normal" if you like, but that only
417.
by eviks 7mo ago
Welcome to Microsoft! Enjoy the ever-growing backlog of bugs to fix!
418.
by eviks 7mo ago
Yeah, long periods of total disfunction get ingrained Though just to ref my original point > burned before, and they're never touching the stove again Except they are sitting on the stove with their asses burning, which cuts all the
419.
by eviks 7mo ago
Though this doesn't make much sense on its surface - a bug means something is already broken, and he tells of millions of crashes per month, so it was visibly broken. 100% chance of being broken (bug) > some chance of breakage from
420.
by eviks 7mo ago
> and very familiar to end users. How is this a factor for the very few users going you use it? (besides, for the primitive needs familiarity is of questionable use to begin with, almost any gui email client would do)

More ›