evan1107

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by evan1107 3y ago

   Doesn’t apply to red hat
2. 2.▲
   by evan1107 3y ago

   Based on your provided links the apples to apples comparison for RHEL Server Standard Support ($799) would be the Oracle Basic Support ($499) Also, considering that OEL is downstream from RHEL how sustainable do we really think it would be
3. 3.▲
   by evan1107 3y ago

   Yeah this is just opportunistic PR. Oracle cares less about Open Source than even the most brain dead Red Hatter. As with all things Oracle, they are taking the angle that potentially creates a revenue opportunity for themselves. This is fi
4. 4.▲
   by evan1107 3y ago

   Yeah Red Hat does share all the code for customers who purchase binaries and they are not imposing further restrictions on recipients of those binaries with their EULA. If the EULA is violated Red Hat is simply exercising their rights to no
5. 5.▲
   by evan1107 3y ago

   Isn’t that the same amount of time Rocky would be supported?
6. 6.▲
   by evan1107 3y ago

   Based on what I can tell Red Hat agrees with that and has gone through great efforts to invest in and evolve the CentOS project. The current state of the project is CentOS stream which is still a LTS enterprise distribution and has an effic
7. 7.▲
   by evan1107 3y ago

   Isn’t this kind of what the RHEL clones were doing? Taking a snapshot of RHEL and then repackaging it, and in the case of Rocky Linux selling support. All without actually making any contributions back to the community. Almalinux actually c