ethical-ai

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ethical-ai 6y ago

   In AI research conferences are main way to publish, if I understand you correctly. It is generally considered to be a bad practice to submit "such an early draft" for peer review. Moreover, if it was accepted, it would be "ci
2. 2.▲
   by ethical-ai 6y ago

   > Though Bender asked us not to publish the paper itself because the authors didn’t want such an early draft circulating online Should not you avoid submitting early drafts which are not good enough to be published yet?
3. 3.▲
   by ethical-ai 6y ago

   I'm not sure why everyone refer to the process as "retracting" rather than "withdrawing", given the paper was not accepted yet. It sounds for me pretty reasonable to withdraw the paper which has flaws to fix and res
4. 4.▲
   by ethical-ai 6y ago

   What I really cannot understand is how someone who works on ethics can think that revealing names of anonymous reviewer is OK? Why would they need those names anyway? I'm also unable to think of any reason they might need the identitie