Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
estebank
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
661.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
> Both cars and pedestrians can be videotaped in public, without asking for their explicit permission. This is not universally true. Legislation is different from place to place.
662.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
Kind of like Target.
663.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
That's a factor of how many units are serviced by a set of stairs. On the same surface area you can have one large building with two staircases and one long corridor that splits the building down the middle, or you can have two separat
664.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
Isn't that the same situation whether there's a single staircase, staircase + fire escape or two staircases?
665.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
Fire deaths per 100k in 2019: US .82 UK .38 https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/fire-death-rates
666.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
I enjoy helping people get up to speed, but after a while it becomes overwhelming for sure. It's just that if I'm not around for some reason I know that others will review things, eventually. PR reviews will continue if I get
667.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
I'm surprised at how many people seem to focus so much on the effect of incoming PRs that require some mentoring to get them to a mergeable state or on "entitled users". I don't think those are significant contributors t
668.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
This is a post in a personal blog that they wrote because they wanted to write it. Someone else came across it and pointed people outside of it's desired audience that it existed. If I make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and offe
669.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
If you think that the project makes "fuck you" decisions at every turn, I invite you to peruse our issue tracker and PR queue. The burnout problems are because people care too much about making things better, and that is a never
670.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
That is not an universal position amongst developers. I would even go as far as to say that it's not even a majority position.
671.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
A Windows build is explicitly not in the plans, at least today, from what I've seen.
672.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
If everything goes well, he's going to deal with that by making at least a third film adapting Messiah. https://geektyrant.com/news/dune-messiah-reportedly-greenlit...
673.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
> It too feels sterile, but in that movie it works because it is true to the lore: all natural life has died out and the few remaining species are extreme luxuries that only the most wealthy people can afford. As opposed to Arrakis, a p
674.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
Blocking the EB GC applications of an employer that had layoffs screws over the employee, not the employer. If anything, the employer gets to have that employee tied to them for that additional time, regardless of the desires of the employe
675.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
There are already restrictions on visa and employer sponsored green card applications for 6 months after a layoff, iirc.
676.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
Degree and work history are already a significant part of evaluation on L1/L2 and H1B visas. IIRC 3 years of work experience are considered equivalent to 1 year of college education, which allows those who didn't get a degree but
677.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
I think there would be value of such an option, as long as it would be completely forbidden to publish to crates.io with code that only works with those flags. It could work by replacing any function with type errors (including those caused
678.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
If that's the workflow you want during development, you can always replace references with a RwLock. That of course is not made very fun by neither the language (you need to touch too many places in your code to switch back and forth)
679.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
I would like that mode exclusively for the test suite to use. That way you start writing your tests, and if there's a borrowck error You delay that until the test runs. If it runs, and then it fails when accessing data, you can give mo
680.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
Because it doesn't have ADTs and pattern matching, which the gp explicitly called out as their reason to use Rust. There are garbage collected languages that have that, but Go isn't one of them.
681.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
FWIW, you can also write Rust without having to "deal" with the borrow checker either. A common problem I see from experienced programmers picking up Rust is trying to write code with minimal allocations, before learning enoug
682.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
When I walk my dogs around the neighborhood I can count more cars blocking the sidewalk than scooters.
683.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
It was the last iteration of refinement on the UI that was designed for 95. NT was meant to have its own shell, but that didn't pan out so the 95 shell was ported over.
684.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
Look at Goals and Scope in https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2023/11/15/spec-visio... for what the Rust spec will be.
685.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
> If the compiler claims to follow the specified version of the spec, and it doesn't, you file a compiler bug. > And then use the subset that it supports, perhaps by using an older spec if it supports that fully. Perhaps looking
686.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
A specification can be prescriptive (stating how things should work) or descriptive (stating the observable behavior of a specific version of software). For example earlier in Rust's post-1.0 life the borrow checker changed behavior a
687.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
The laptop could come with a USB-C "master key" on the box, tied to that specific laptop. Keep that key at home, and all the anti-theft benefits continue to apply, while keeping the owner in control of their hardware.
688.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
Support wasn't dumped, it was demoted from Tier 2 to Tier 3 to better reflect the level of support that backend effectively already had. As mentioned in that thread, if someone steps up to maintain it, it can be bumped again to Tier 2.
689.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
If the compiler you use and the spec of your language disagree, what do you do? The Project is working on a specification. The Foundation hired someone for it. A Rust spec done purely on paper ahead of time would be the contents of the acce
690.
▲
by
estebank
3y ago
Thats why we run crater against all of crates.io: there are changes that should be allowed that we hold off on because 9f breakage, and fixes we assumed we couldn't land that in reality had no real world impact. As time goes on the con
More ›