Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
estearum
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
271.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Well for one, there's not nearly enough of them to be valuable the way that Flock is. Two, they're pointed exclusively at roads. Three, their outputs don't show up in court cases as evidence, which itself dramatically reduces
272.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
pov: a vatnik tries to understand western values
273.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
I could be wrong, but I don't think the UK has a network of privately owned ANPRs that can create ~complete pictures of people's comings and goings, and that data has effectively zero legal protections whatsoever. Automated speed
274.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
The study you linked is evidence that prior infection reduces the rate of reinfection. Yes, this would be surprising if it were not true. Your prior claim was that prior infection is equivalent to or superior to vaccination (i.e. relying
275.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
So why did you claim to be treated like a leper? And yes, all studies have limitations, especially observational studies done in the middle of an emergency. Here's your claim: "There was never any indication in the data that a pre
276.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
> There was never any indication in the data that a previously recovered person posed any kind of heightened threat to anyone else Nope, also not true. There actually was plenty of evidence of exactly this even by August 2021: https:&#x
277.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
That's just not true. Here's the authoritative guidance on the rollout: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/103787/cdc_103787_DS1.pdf What gives you the idea that a low-risk person opting not to get the
278.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Not really. It's the "making decisions based on best-available evidence is good, even if every once in a while it leads you astray." You're more than welcome to read the evidence they use to create their policies. If you
279.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
No there actually is in general and it's the same exact way in which there's generally good guidance for medicating your children: they're called evidence-backed guidelines. The contexts in which drugs make sense is capture
280.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
I suspect that you and GP and GGP are talking about different time scales. Vaccinating your children for COVID during peak COVID was the right thing to do both for them and for the adults they interact with. Vaccinating your children for CO
281.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Maybe you should hang out with a different "everybody" if they systematically believe untrue things
282.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Finally someone said it! This is exactly why we need to be REMOVING VIAGRA FROM THE MARKET! There were NO longitudinal studies! NOTHING looked at psychological effects! REMOVE VIAGRA TODAY!
283.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Let's assume that it's correct that "no one who was not immunocompromised should have ever taken it." (It's not, but let's assume that it is) Was this knowably true in Q1 2021? Can you please share the specific
284.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Take it from someone who has read all of said emails: no, they don't prove that.
285.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
You're misinterpreting data here. You are conflating the fact that the clinical trials didn't measure infection/transmission (which is very hard to do in a clinical trial) with the distinct claim that they didn't reduce
286.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
What?
287.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
+1 the public health apparatuses' actual statements were impressively correct even if you don't account for the underlying uncertainty at the time. Where public health officials "failed" was not having a megaphone lo
288.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
What?
289.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
And, critically, a malignant narcissist in the highest office.
290.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
> They also left the public in the dark about the risk of vaccine-associated myocarditis, especially in young males, many of whom experienced permanent heart tissue damage. Not true. This was correctly disclosed in the trial results as a
291.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
I too can't detect the meaningful qualitative differences that might emerge from changes in prevalence or intensity of a given behavior. Next up: Oh drinking alcohol is an enjoyable social activity? Well tell that to my uncle who drank
292.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
It's really not that clear. For example there are specific procedural requirements, enforcement cannot be capricious or arbitrary, they can't be vague, etc etc
293.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
The question isn't whether the US government has power to sanction people, it's whether the Executive has the authority to use that power for this purpose against these entities. "The bear" (rah rah, bro) is governed b
294.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Is your implication that something responsible for 5% of the demand is responsible for 5% of the price? Because... that's not how prices work. And certainly not energy prices, which have both significant capex requirements, spot-mark
295.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Hegseth himself literally committed a war crime already. Simply declaring no quarter is itself a war crime. On the other hand, it makes both the current SecDef and any 14 year old COD player feel REALLY badass. Giving your own personnel
296.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Think the ICC is engaged in political posturing and theater all you want, sanctions are not an appropriate tool
297.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Or because people see: 1) their electricity bills rising 2) their land prices (read: rent) rising 3) actual fucking nutjobs in charge of these companies who can't seem to simply not say actual nutjob shit all the fucking time 4) entr
298.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
It seems quite clear at this point that important parts of our social and economic fabric are in fact damaged by people buying everything online, ordering food delivery, drive-through windows, streaming movies, and so on
299.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
Humans are quite bad at doing what brings them (durable) happiness
300.
▲
by
estearum
2mo ago
> When my dog starts running around the living room swinging her rope around, it becomes more urgent. Because you can intervene before the consequence gets baked in > When she bumps the table and the glass starts falling, it's an
More ›