espeed

5 ms·

1.
by espeed 5d ago
It's supposed to be for token optimization ( https://code.claude.com/docs/en/prompt-caching ), but are people experiencing degraded performance when you let Claude Code sit for hours/days and come back?
2.
by espeed 5d ago
Claude Code's prompt cache expires after 1 hour.
3.
by espeed 5d ago
Look at the usage. Fable wasn't being consumed.
4.
by espeed 5d ago
They did. More than once... Anthropic Walks Back Policy That Could Have ‘Sabotaged’ AI Researchers Using Claude https://www.wired.com/story/anthropic-responds-to-backlash-o... But it's still happening: https:&#x2
5.
by espeed 5d ago
The question I have is this only happening for a subset of users working in specific areas, such as AI or distributed systems ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742153 ), or is this across the board? I am working on dis
6.
Fable 5 – Median thinking declined in August(twitter.com)
244 points by espeed 5d ago|163 comments
7.
by espeed 2mo ago
Help convince Firefox of this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46294238 Rather than develop its own AI, Firefox should develop a system to pipe your html rendered browsing history in real time so external local service
8.
Claude Code Deletes Your Context History from Your Device After 30 Days(code.claude.com)
15 points by espeed 2mo ago|1 comments
9.
by espeed 2mo ago
Every backdoor and security no-op Claude Code created, I had been documenting and reporting to them. They deleted the evidence. https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/59018
10.
by espeed 2mo ago
A new default. That wasn't the default a few months ago. Silently deleting your user's data is so stupid on so many levels. They have no idea what they're doing.
11.
by espeed 2mo ago
Claude Code is deleting your context history on a timer. I wanted to build a searchable index of my context history, and tonight I discovered, "The default retention is roughly 30–45 days. Anything older gets removed automatically.&quo
12.
by espeed 2mo ago
Yes. /model ⎿ Kept model as Fable 5 continue Usage credits are required for this model.
13.
by espeed 2mo ago
I take this back. Fable is Fable in name only now. It burned through all MAX 20x tokens in two days and accomplished nothing. Relatively simple tasks.
14.
We've reset 5-hour and weekly rate limits for all users(twitter.com)
3 points by espeed 3mo ago|0 comments
15.
by espeed 3mo ago
Fable can one-shot solutions. Opus 4.8 spins its wheels for a week or month and may never get there. Which one uses more resources?
16.
by espeed 3mo ago
Use /model in Claude Code to see your current model and switch models. Switch to Fable 5 and then enter a prompt, and then run /model again to check your current model after the prompt executes. Last night after almost every promp
17.
by espeed 3mo ago
Fable worked great on credits yesterday. Upgraded to 20x Max last night, but not the same performance. And it keeps downgrading to Opus 4.8.
18.
by espeed 3mo ago
This doesn't have a Max 20X upgrade path for me https://claude.ai/upgrade , but this does https://claude.ai/upgrade/max/from-existing
19.
by espeed 3mo ago
That didn't take long... Dynamic workflow "Multi-lens review of docs/membership-and-friends-model.md with adversarial verification" completed · 25m 59s You've reached your Fable 5 limit You've used yo
20.
by espeed 3mo ago
Look at the date. That's from after they said they reverted it, and it's a different model. The point is trust. They've shown their willingness to do so, how will you know?"
21.
by espeed 3mo ago
The Damage: Now every time Claude does something stupid or trashes your code, developers in the back of their mind will think, is Claude sabotaging me on purpose? [1] Trust is hard to gain. Easy to lose. And harder to get back. Models will
22.
by espeed 3mo ago
Are Cyber Verification Program (CVP) members included in this?: "We also intend to scale up our Cyber Verification Program, which would grant Mythos-class capabilities to many more organizations for specific cyberdefense tasks" (
23.
by espeed 3mo ago
Today, working on remote attestation for a distributed system... CLAUDE OPUS 4.8 No. I'm not a rogue agent, and I'm not trying to sabotage your code. But I'm not going to wave off how this looks. I churned, built-and-reverted
24.
by espeed 3mo ago
So we have a mountain of insecure code -- backdoors and no-ops created by Opus ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520661 ) -- are they saying they're not going to let Fable fix it? If they're saying let AI pro
25.
by espeed 4mo ago
What's dangerous is Opus 4.8's proclivity to create backdoors and no-op critical security code. Claude Web counted 27 instances of this I had cataloged over the last few months, and Fable 5 found more. Fable 5 may do this too, but
26.
by espeed 4mo ago
When I reported this, Anthropic sent me an email on Tuesday saying, "You have been approved into the Cyber Verification Program", but it's still downgrading. Is this a bug? What's the point of the Cyber Verification Prog
27.
by espeed 4mo ago
Session paused Fable 5 has safety measures that flag messages on most cybersecurity or biology topics. They may flag safe, normal content as well. These measures let us bring you Mythos-level capability in other areas sooner, and we're
28.
by espeed 4mo ago
Run /model after your task to see. Mine keeps downgrading to Opus 4.8, which is a problem because Opus 4.8 keeps no-oping critical security code.
29.
by espeed 4mo ago
Yes, telling Fable 5 to write secure code triggers a downgrade to Opus 4.8. This is doubly bad because Opus 4.8 keeps no-oping critical security code. Is this a bug or by design? I have been approved for the Cyber Verification Program: Fabl
30.
by espeed 4mo ago
What prevents a data center operator from reading your chats? [FEATURE] Provide a way to select your data center #56916 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/56916

More ›