esmevane

9 ms·

61.
by esmevane 15y ago
It could be that she had admirable self-control. It could also be that she didn't think it was that big of a deal, or that she didn't have an overinflated sense of self, or that she herself had done something embarrassing recently and saw a
62.
by esmevane 15y ago
Thanks for this. I had the exact same thought when I read it. After a brief moment of offense. I think I could write an essay or several on the ridiculous misconceptions I hear going around in some circles, and this is one of my favorites
63.
by esmevane 15y ago
There's also the (insulting) concept that many of these folks seem to have, which is: Did it never cross your mind that a lot of us spend the bulk of our free time developing our own ideas? For the majority of Idea Man pitches I've spent t
64.
by esmevane 15y ago
That's kind of a can of worms. On one hand, you probably wouldn't be noticed for not suing people for the name. No one would really have the opportunity to appreciate your benign decision to not engage an exclusivity to your trademark. On
65.
by esmevane 15y ago
Leena, http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&#3... As you can see, you have published numerous articles on this company with a blatant formula to your titling strategy. If I may offer some constructive criticism, I wou
66.
by esmevane 15y ago
No, I believe that I do get what you're saying. I just don't agree that the message preaches magical thinking. It very clearly depicts a process of deciding on a goal, and focusing your efforts (actual efforts) to obtaining that specific
67.
by esmevane 15y ago
I think you'll find that the article is saying: decide on your goals, be determined and work hard to obtain them, and quitcher bitchin'. I didn't discover any mention of magic.
68.
by esmevane 15y ago
I don't want to be overtly negative here, but this document is a philosophical terror. I recognize that you wrote it out of inspiration and tried to encapsulate it to an abbreviated timeframe, but where you seem to want to espouse productiv
69.
by esmevane 15y ago
Thanks for posting this. There was a lot of care in delivering this product. As others have pointed out, this is so compellingly done that you could legitimately expect to pay for it. But no, it's open sourced - thank you very much for th
70.
by esmevane 15y ago
I don't feel like you've done any research on this. There is also the possibility that you are faulting Google for not making creation applications, because you don't acknowledge other participants in the venue which work very well on Chrom
71.
by esmevane 15y ago
This is interesting to me. How can I put this as diplomatically as possible? I'm glad that there is a culture like this out there. It espouses productivity and gives a real view as to what folks will do in order to try their hand at a ser
72.
by esmevane 15y ago
I can't help but think this blame mentality is the root of a lot of problems with the intended discourse, here. The issue at hand isn't whether or not Facebook has the power to do this, but rather that the system is intrinsically moronic in
73.
by esmevane 15y ago
Not only that, but they've used this same buzz word formula in almost the same exact context something like a week ago, except it was about Apple carrying Square readers in their stores. Edit: http://techcrunch.com/2011/04/16/square-apple
74.
by esmevane 15y ago
Seconded. I would add something about "(i) Killer" posts, too. Almost anything by TechCrunch, since I've been aware of them, has been fluff along these lines. Sensationalist garbage.
75.
by esmevane 15y ago
So an extremely user-friendly, tremendously low-bar entry-level direct-to-consumer device, built primarily for easy web productivity, is outstripping a system known for its tremendous ability to intimidate the computer illiterate, in the te
76.
by esmevane 15y ago
Also, why does everything get called a "Killer"? Not only is the terminology getting beaten into the ground (see "solution" in the early 2000s), it's rapidly becoming associated with products that are flat, and could never hope of dethronin
77.
by esmevane 15y ago
I'm glad to hear this voiced in the communities I've attended. Honestly, I'm having extreme bouts of difficulty explaining this to the folks I collaborate with. They are genuinely wonderful folks, but I just can't seem to get across the s
78.
by esmevane 15y ago
You used the word properly. In addition, your response smacks of philosophical irony. Further, I think it's ironic that even people who champion the proper use of ironic, don't know what it genuinely signifies. I'd love to say it's also un
79.
by esmevane 16y ago
"The problem isn't that everything you know and love about GNOME is suddenly gone, and Ubuntu 11.04 is, for all intents and purposes a completely different experience than everything that came before it." Am I to assume, then, that it follo
80.
by esmevane 16y ago
I see that most of the folks here are choosing to discuss the morality of this video; some are electing to defend, and some showing disapproval. What I'm finding odd about these reactions is that, viewing other people's reactions (outside o
81.
by esmevane 16y ago
I'm extremely relieved to see so many posts mirroring my exact impression from this article. Here we have a splendid reference as to the power of words to illicit an emotion, with no real effort to craft an argument of any substance.
82.
by esmevane 16y ago
I think we like to let our imagination and the vision of all the possibilities it brings us take reign, and that is good. Because of that, I can definitely throw a handful of monetary speculations into the air concerning this service. To g
83.
by esmevane 16y ago
The nature of the Father of Linux being, in essence, an enraged (often insightful) crusader is just a point of pride for a lot of people who know about him and like Linux.
84.
by esmevane 16y ago
If you're aware of a better place to discuss my dissatisfaction with a recurring news source, here, I think that, itself, would be more newsworthy than this article.
85.
by esmevane 16y ago
I'm sorry, but I didn't read the article. I'm just posting right now because I clicked on it accidentally for the exact same reason that I decided to quit reading Tech Crunch: there is little to no substance there, but there are tremendou
86.
by esmevane 16y ago
Thank you for the links. I saw this post and thought, "Isn't this old news?" Maybe not, but I could have sworn I saw something in this vein weeks ago.
87.
by esmevane 16y ago
This is just evidence of the failure of the Facebook ad platform. With the sheer abundance of data that Facebook commands, this should not be the case.
88.
by esmevane 16y ago
Do you mean, because they have no ability to compete, they should have made a move to eradicate superior platforms before it became obvious that their ad product is a waste of money?
89.
by esmevane 16y ago
Competition proves the market. Why are you disappointed to learn that other people might have the same idea? It means it's worth pursuing if more than one person is doing it, right? Just add your own flavor, and have integrity and faith