esf

3 ms·

1.
by esf 8y ago
It's a revenue raiser because it does raise the taxes of people outside this range. Primarily people in 500k - 1m range were hitting AMT before, especially if married or with children. Don't misunderstand me: I am responding only
2.
by esf 8y ago
Sure, but the status quo in California didn't really change with the new tax law for this income group, contra the comment. If the taxes didn't deter you before, they aren't different now.
3.
by esf 8y ago
Am half of a high earning couple in a bit above this range in California. Surprisingly, my taxes changed very little this year. In years prior, I always had to pay AMT, in which SALT deductions were already disallowed. The new tax law is ba
4.
by esf 8y ago
The question and references are specifically about domestic state to state migration patterns. That was was obvious from context. Illegal immigration to Texas btw is much higher than to California: https://www.sacbee.com/sit
5.
by esf 8y ago
California migration is disproportionate this way. In-migration to CA is high income and high educated vs out-migration is middle to low income and less educated. I believe I've seen these trend analyzed in other states as well (low an
6.
by esf 8y ago
No it is many more than that. From the percent I remember seeing and the number of engineers Google employs, more like 1500+? 7 is a high, difficult to get to level, average employees are not expected to pass 5, but Google is so large that&
7.
by esf 8y ago
Kaposi Sarcoma is caused by HHV-8, a completely different virus than HSV-1/2. They are in the herpes virus family, but this is a huge virus group including eg chicken pox (HHV-3) and Epstein Barr virus that causes mono (HHV-4).
8.
by esf 8y ago
The pill was already part of HIV trratment, it does nothing to change the effectiveness of HIV tests. The only unknown would be whether if you are one of the very, very few people that manages to contract HIV while taking prep, your antibod
9.
by esf 8y ago
It's not a pure logical argument. What you are describing has never been observed though in anyone taking any type of antiretroviral therapy in the now 20+ years of the HAART era. This is a completely unfounded what-if. The donors you
10.
by esf 8y ago
Truvada does nothing to change identification of HIV+ donors. Truvada does not change response to HIV tests, an HIV+ person taking Truvada as part of treatment does not stop testing positive for HIV antibodies. Nothing changes from the exis