ersatzz

6 ms·

1.
by ersatzz 3y ago
I do not advocate for the oppression of children. Nothing I said have called into question the rights of a five year old. I never said that guardians can't advocate for their children. In fact the only point I made that you addressed y
2.
by ersatzz 3y ago
I don't know about you but when I was five I was busied myself by picking my nose and playing my gameboy. If given a soapbox I would probably voice something to the effect of being allowed to do the former with unlimited access to the
3.
by ersatzz 3y ago
Giving kids a flight sim in cereal packs? One purposefully made for Linux no less sounds like an awful idea. Of course they don't do that.
4.
by ersatzz 3y ago
https://youtu.be/ACdh-yzENXM
5.
by ersatzz 3y ago
In that very article the FSF says to comply with both the GPL and "regulatons" companies are free to employ a ROM. Nowhere in that article does it say the regulations must change. Why even bring this article up? The FSF seem prett
6.
by ersatzz 3y ago
Kaczynski would've probably said the same thing honestly.
7.
by ersatzz 3y ago
No there exists natural/universal rights and legal/customary rights. I should've left the quoted part out as its presumptuous, my bad.
8.
by ersatzz 3y ago
Governments can say whatever they want. My question was rather that if the government ceases to provide protection to... my exclusive right to my wallet, are others free to take it? Would this be theft, liberation or recovery? What happens
9.
by ersatzz 3y ago
Do you genuinely believe this or do you just approach property at large from a realist's perspective?
10.
by ersatzz 3y ago
This comment is surreal given what happened the last 3 years.
11.
by ersatzz 3y ago
Manufacturers could always open source the firmware themselves.
12.
by ersatzz 3y ago
It is trivial to get a list of all Tor exit IPs from the Tor Project itself, blocking it completely.