Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ericmay
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
421.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
I'm certainly pro-America and anti-communist/fascist as a bias, but I don't really care about whether AI tools are open-weight or not. I just use the products that best fit my needs. I just think the arguments put forth regar
422.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
I can see changes but I'm not sure about flat tariffs going away completely. One of the reasons for those is because what China will do to avoid American tariffs is to basically try and set up shop in a 3rd country, or just do some leg
423.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
Not applied accurately with respect to my comment, but it is a funny one and also new to me in the naming.
424.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
> I don't think there's a strong consensus on Hacker News. Even something like the time of day an article is posted might get different engagement depending on who is active in which time zones. Based on my own experience and
425.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
It’s rather amusing to me to read comments like this, and then simultaneously whenever a Chinese company or team releases open-weight models or whatever there is a giant round of applause, America is so behind, and there’s nothing but posit
426.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
Sure it can end up with a different policy which may or may not be as effective, but the goals are the same. So trying to divorce the two parties here is also a bit of nonsense.
427.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
I think as a counter point we continue to see investment and buildout. What do you mean the market is more skeptical? Of course the market doesn’t really have an opinion per se and aren’t all of these companies growing in valuation, revenue
428.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
> It’s unclear where American labs future capital will come from. It’s unclear to you, perhaps? But they’ll raise funds and/or debt as needed in the US capital markets as they have been doing. > They pretty much exhausted private
429.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
> Immigration is clearly economic policy. Sure but it's not strictly an economic policy. If you want to just talk about the economics of immigration I'd be happy to discuss that. I think there are pros and cons to many differen
430.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
It's not just the French! I'm obsessed with it too. It's fantastic.
431.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
Sure they have an effect but are they economic policies? If you want to take the approach that everything is an economic policy I guess we could do that, but I think it's a bit limiting. I guess also, what's the goal of economic p
432.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
Ministry for the Future is, in my view, much better.
433.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
> Pretty sure the Democrats would not have done either the ridiculous tariffs They may not have gone with that specific approach, but the direction was the same. Instead of tariffs the Biden Administration's BBB bill gave money to c
434.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
> We might take in more taxes, but when we cut funding for childhood cancer research, and build more missiles... is this really the way we want our money spent? Well we all have our opinions on how our money is spent. I for one think we
435.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
Maybe, maybe not. And when a vast majority of the population isn't working what do these numbers really tell us? If we have fewer jobs, but then the people doing those jobs are paid more and thus paying more in taxes, maybe the jobs nu
436.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
I agree, because (and I'm being a bit flippant) I sure as hell am not giving up my gas stove while billionaires fly around in private jets and MAGA guys are coal-rolling in their F-250s... It seems to me that carbon capture technology
437.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
And let’s also not forget, we all want the climate crises fixed, but nobody is willing to personally make any changes to their lifestyle! All parties are incentivized against fixing this problem.
438.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
We have everything and still use antennas for local broadcast: NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, Fox. Sports, especially football, are very easy to access over the air.
439.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
You're free to disagree with my explanation but it's logical and consistent and I'm happy to continue to stand by that.
440.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
No it wasn't a non-sequitur. Instead of repeating myself I'll just link to this good explanation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49197575
441.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
Well they are up at least in part due to policy such as tariffs and war which unfortunately is imposed upon us in the US (Russia invading Ukraine, Iran destabilizing the Middle East), but I also think an important factor is the increase in
442.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
Well, I guess if the OP was under the mistaken belief that the only reason for high prices was because of an oligopoly, then sure. But that premise is incorrect and it would be a bit bizarre to suggest that given at a minimum we could look
443.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
That wasn't what I wrote or communicated.
444.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
Well if you care about portion size or the introduction of substitutes then you can change your buying habits. We only eat out for dinner at great restaurants because I can cook better food at home in a lot of cases. You're going to ha
445.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
No, markets still function anyway over the long term (monopolies go bankrupt and are disrupted all the time) and if you are worried about oligopoly you want to ensure that communism and state ownership of the means of production is stamped
446.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
Many people see this as a problem, but I see it as a normal function of market economies. Disruptions, changes in government policy, changes in consumer behavior, and more will over the long term just work themselves out. Of course some pol
447.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
Well if you have 50 employees in Ireland who are unionized or even, say some retail shops but the vast majority of your high-income and irreplaceable workers aren’t in a union and aren’t inclined to join or form one, I’d say some number of
448.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
> China does lead the frontier. If you're a cybersecurity researcher, a biologist or work in any other censored field, there's nothing that the American models can do for you. The frontier effectively begins where abliterated m
449.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
> The same way that OpenAI and Anthropic will dig themselves out of the hole; By pawning off the training costs onto taxpaying citizens. Sounds to me like it’s just the same strategy except the US is doing better and can just release ope
450.
▲
by
ericmay
2mo ago
> When someone says that you have no experience being a professional baseball player, do you say "errrhhmm ackshually, I brush my teeth every morning just like an MLB player does. I put on my pants every morning. I have even held a
More ›