erezyehuda

7 ms·

1.
by erezyehuda 4y ago
I think a big part of this topic discussion is that there's a LOT of value in those- that many disagreements are simply down to having a different understanding about context and facts, and that giving the other person the benefit of t
2.
by erezyehuda 5y ago
It says in the bill- > (d) "Social media algorithm" means the software used by social media platforms to (1) prioritize content, and (2) direct the prioritized content to the account holder.
3.
by erezyehuda 5y ago
Merits of the bill aside, I think the headline is spun in a way to make the bill seem totally witless, when it's not. There could be more specific wording, of course, and debating the actual merits of the bill is always fair game, but
4.
by erezyehuda 5y ago
It's kind of hard to assess what impact you'd see, but for me, changing teams has ended up giving me a chance to work with new tech, a broader understanding of our system overall, and it's been a good chance to get to know mo
5.
by erezyehuda 5y ago
I can't help but notice that your link to New Secret Santa is under the "old" subdomain.
6.
by erezyehuda 6y ago
If I recall correctly, Netflix paying to not have their data rates throttled was a real occurrence.
7.
by erezyehuda 7y ago
I was literally just looking at this for the same reason. I'm sure it's a bit silly and sentimental, but the notion of there still being a living connection to them in the world makes me feel they're not entirely gone.
8.
by erezyehuda 8y ago
It seems like you read more cynicism and hostility in the previous comment than was actually there.
9.
by erezyehuda 8y ago
Sadly, I can still imagine someone crashing into a static car on the highway. I can imagine normal-speed continuation, mid-lane stopping, and attempting to navigate to the side of the road all seem to have some pretty heavy risks. I do wond
10.
by erezyehuda 8y ago
Getting to the side of the road seems like it could be pretty risky for current autopilots, though perhaps things are further ahead than I know.
11.
by erezyehuda 8y ago
It's kind of funny- I assume other people will assume I'm not productive at home, so I end up hyper-focusing on getting things done when I'm working from home just to prove I'm not slacking off.
12.
by erezyehuda 8y ago
Yeah, I definitely get what you mean. I try to see if there's merit in what people say, even on occasions where they forgot their manners at home (as I've done plenty), but in this case, they didn't bother to justify anything
13.
by erezyehuda 8y ago
I'm sorry to say it, but that framing actually makes me see more merit in the comment you're responding to, when I didn't much before. I'm of the opinion that people do deliberately lie to themselves, quite regularly.
14.
by erezyehuda 8y ago
Dijkstra gave pretty concise justification for 0-indexing, so I wouldn't reduce it down to "authority" for why people use it. While I'm personally comfortable hopping back and forth between conventions, is there any deep
15.
by erezyehuda 8y ago
Costs aside, wouldn't replacing carbon emissions with methane be drastically worse? Doing a casual search says that methane is 2000-3000% more potent as a GHG.
16.
by erezyehuda 8y ago
He can send messages at his discretion. With Twitter, however, tweets are (in this case) considered public announcements, with blocked people being exceptions on a personal level, and the ruling is that he is not allowed to make those excep
17.
by erezyehuda 9y ago
No red square for me. Using a recent Firefox on OSX.
18.
by erezyehuda 9y ago
Looking again at what you'd put earlier, your acknowledgement very much seems to have the not-total-impossibility of them being correct as a throwaway caveat, not as a real consideration of the situation in any sense. I suspect that it
19.
by erezyehuda 9y ago
I get the feeling that you misunderstood what they were trying to communicate and prioritized literal word usage over context. They should not have said "quite authoritatively". Using "quite correctly" would have been be
20.
by erezyehuda 9y ago
I'm not sure I'd say "one or more times" really sums up going dozens of times, as umanwizard said they have. While I'll give you that we don't know if they have a PhD (which, sure, would be more definite author
21.
by erezyehuda 9y ago
What do you mean by "answers cannot be edited"? They definitely can be, and not just by the person who posted it. I've updated an older answer or two.
22.
by erezyehuda 9y ago
Pretty sure C-b,[ will do that.
23.
by erezyehuda 10y ago
I don't think making an good buying decision should need to take subliminal cues into account, like someone predicting a storm by a sudden shift in wind behavior, and forcing your customer base into this buying paradigm is a huge risk
24.
by erezyehuda 10y ago
Does anyone have a mirrored or cached version of the post?
25.
by erezyehuda 10y ago
All they need to do is open the developer console, which is probably better anyway.
26.
by erezyehuda 10y ago
The very existence of RunScript combined with the ability to rebind functions makes this impossible, I think. Unfortunately, I'd guess that, at this point, those features are too tangled into the game to be easily cut out.