erentz

11 ms·

121.
by erentz 4y ago
The one side effect I’ve heard from my doctor who has patients on LDN, that fortunately seems fairly rare, but that can catch people off guard is sudden depression. People a few days to a week into starting it suddenly having uncontrollable
122.
by erentz 4y ago
Oh that’s not good. Thanks for letting me know.
123.
by erentz 4y ago
This is quite interesting to me also. I have a neuro and inflammatory disease with elevated liver enzymes since getting sick. It seems TUDCA is fairly safe. How does one calculate their dose? Looks like I need to find a reputable brand and
124.
A Train Blew up in Ohio, Why did that Happen? [video](youtube.com)
2 points by erentz 4y ago|0 comments
125.
Efficiency and the Decline of American Freight Railroads(homesignalblog.wordpress.com)
1 points by erentz 4y ago|0 comments
126.
A Norfolk Southern Policy Lets Officials Order Crews to Ignore Safety Alerts(propublica.org)
16 points by erentz 4y ago|0 comments
127.
by erentz 4y ago
Typically they're just left there. But every once in a while someone will decide it makes sense to acquire the cable for cheap, pull it up, and re-use it somewhere else that doesn't have high bandwidth requirements but would still
128.
Selfie of U-2 Pilot Flying Alongside Chinese Spy Balloon Leaks(thedrive.com)
10 points by erentz 4y ago|0 comments
129.
by erentz 4y ago
Do we know it was without being detected? I got the impression somewhere that it was ignored because they frequently are for a while due to lack of sidings of adequate length to stop in.
130.
by erentz 4y ago
Maybe not? If what we care about isn't derailed trains but the actually derailed cars, like say lost packets on a network. Here's a graph of total derailed cars. He has a lot of graphs I haven't reviewed all of them. But migh
131.
by erentz 4y ago
Saw this interesting Twitter thread with some data yesterday. In fact it doesn't seem derailments are unusually high compared with history. It seems they may even be decreasing. https://twitter.com/mike10010100/sta
132.
by erentz 4y ago
One of the biggest issues that prevents this is that states cannot require residency requirements (e.g. must have lived in state for 2 years) as part of the criteria for access to such social safety nets. https://en.wikipedia.org
133.
by erentz 4y ago
Probably because the F-22 wasn't needed since this one was at a lower altitude, ~20,000 ft if I recall correctly.
134.
by erentz 4y ago
Couple of interesting twitter threads on this from Tyler (The Drive). He suggests this has been coming/happening for some time. https://twitter.com/aviation_intel/status/162414986417840128... Also that we are
135.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Grounded a World-Class Climber(outsideonline.com)
31 points by erentz 4y ago|0 comments
136.
by erentz 4y ago
> But you probably knew all that and I have been concern trolled. Oh well, I try. I think the less than hour old account with random username might've given it away. :-) Unfortunately a seemingly unusual amount of that on this story
137.
by erentz 4y ago
Hersh didn't just question some narrative. He presented a fanciful story as fact that is full of holes and does not stand up to scrutiny. Those who are motivated to see the US blamed for it seem to be uninterested in whether his story
138.
by erentz 4y ago
Well if you want to consider motives, what I said makes a clear motive IF Russia did it, for them to leave one of the NS2 pipes untouched doesn't it. Because the history was of Russia trying to blackmail Germany and get Germany to tu
139.
by erentz 4y ago
It’s interesting to me that dang overrode community moderation of this story [1] yesterday. Without having first even read it. A story that was based on an unverified anonymous source, by a discredited journalist, and which as we see now co
140.
by erentz 4y ago
We are discussing nuclear waste in this thread. I said "stored well and safely without issue". You find 2 dead workers from an industrial accident over a 70 year history that was not actually about nuclear waste but was a fuel pro
141.
by erentz 4y ago
Russia had stopped gas flows on NordStream 1 26 days prior to the explosion [1]. This was after a series of reductions, stops, and restarts where they reduced flows and tried to get Germany to break sanctions to send parts. That they then u
142.
by erentz 4y ago
Let me also add these point that everyone seems to want to ignore: NordStream 2 was never put into service. Germany halted it due to the invasion. This was considered a very big deal. At the time of the explosion on 26 Sep there had been no
143.
by erentz 4y ago
> Fukushima Daiichi. In case those two words aren't enough to jog your memory: Yes, I get that nuclear power scares people, which is why we should put aside our emotions on the subject and just deal with the facts. We've had de
144.
by erentz 4y ago
It actually seems to be a case study that empirically proves the opposite. Hundreds of thousands dead in the Russian invasion of Ukraine so far, untold injuries. Incredible amounts of destruction of cities and civilian infrastructure. But y
145.
by erentz 4y ago
We are talking about 32 countries with civilian nuclear power operating for several decades. With oversight by an international body that tracks every bit of nuclear material. Using processes that differ from what was done at Hanford, produ
146.
by erentz 4y ago
I think this part stems from a common response you see from anti-nuclear folks, who frequently point to the issues at Hanford as a reason to be against civilian nuclear power. She's trying to make clear the difference between civilian
147.
Blowing Holes in Seymour Hersh's Pipe Dream(oalexanderdk.substack.com)
152 points by erentz 4y ago|249 comments
148.
by erentz 4y ago
(1): See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34713247 (2): Then why blow the other three? So for the US angle to work here what is the motivation? At the outset of the war Germany stopped NS2 activation plans and started d
149.
by erentz 4y ago
He claims SOCOM covert military operations have to be reported to Gang of Eight but if you use regular Navy forces to do the covert operation you somehow do not. That seems beyond extremely suspect. > There was a vital bureaucratic reaso
150.
by erentz 4y ago
Start from the beginning.[1] The point is there is no good reason for the US to leave one operational, defeating the whole purpose suggested by those claiming the US did it, and worse, leaving open the possibility of a major political victo

More ›