eqvinox

28 ms·

271.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
You can still lock things in the microcontrollers with future updates, sadly. Those fuses can be burned at any time. Unburning them, not so much…
272.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
By the time you know enough to reasonably use clone3, you have also learned that doing so is an exceptionally bad idea save for very rare circumstances.
273.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
You can't "submit as a group". You can request working group adoption, at which point the WG will review your document and form a consensus. > I think lying by omission is a bit, of a stretch, No it's not, since you&#
274.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
It's in the format of an "IETF Draft" and has been uploaded on the IETF datatracker web form as an individual submission. It doesn't even name a working group it's targeting for adoption. It's not an IETF draft
275.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
This can apply as long as the library has no references or dependencies on the application. The illegality of Bambu Labs' actions results from the dependencies of the binary module on the AGPL app, not the other way around.
276.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
One more package manager will fix it. One more! I don't disagree there's probably a need and niche, but why not extend and adapt an existing package manager?
277.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
This really depends on what exactly they're using the word "fork" for here. All I'm saying is that a full-on fork is not the right thing to do when all you're trying to do is have your own frontend, or modify a smal
278.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
Mhm. Okay, honestly, I maybe don't have enough data to judge how much impact that requirement has. I also haven't seen anything on how this works with multiple authors, which could go anywhere from draconian to weakening the enti
279.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
I do believe this policy is appropriate to deal with the reckless disregard of posting hallucinated references. It's a conscious decision to not take the time to check your AI output, and instead waste a whole bunch of other people&#x2
280.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
You don't need to be actively enforcing a rule 100% on everyone. Speed cameras don't cover every stretch of road either. It's enough for them to place this policy and enforce it when they become aware of violations. Someone r
281.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
I mean, that's just startup culture shipping half-baked duct-taped "products". Reengineering a well-used open source project… that's proper hubris territory, if you do it poorly enough. It's outside their "zone
282.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
Working in this field - yeah don't underestimate what's available in "poor" countries. Most do better than poorly governed "rich" countries. And don't use it as an excuse to aim lower. CPE class devices do
283.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
It still means you're permanently hassled with sticking a switch next to it. Yes it's not a requirement per se to include an ethernet switch chip on the board. But at a $300 price tag I'll say it does become a failing.
284.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
You can install whatever you want on Turris devices. And you get schematics and gerber files. https://project.turris.cz/en/hardware-documentation.html
285.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
Depends on the board. Btw, I don't see anything about mainline in TFA, did I miss that? FWIW there is also "OpenWrt mainline" and "Linux mainline"; OpenWrt carries a whole bunch of things on top of Linus' tree
286.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
> When you consider the circumstances a fork is the only thing here that makes sense. No, because a fork and an overlay are not the same thing. Getting your custom frontend has nothing to do with sharing the maintenance burden on all the
287.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
> Built on a RISC-V processor with an open-source boot stack and operating system, it is the most open router on the market […] No it's not [cont'd] > with a fully open-source boot stack (OpenSBI, U-Boot), open-source Linux
288.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
No wonder GitHub is down /s
289.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
If this goes wrong even in the slightest , the ridicule about a drug dealer getting high on their own supply will be neverending and grim.
290.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
Not if your containers are L3 routed through the host ;) (Or did you mean resolving the names of the containers? That'd be handled through unbound-control local_data)
291.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
Want to know a really cursed dirty little magic trick? (as root:) ip route add table local local 8.8.8.8/32 dev lo echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_nonlocal_bind cat <<EOF >/etc/unbo
292.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
Ah, so this was the "compliance" outage that caused them to stop issuing certs.
293.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
> According to Validity’s analysis of 22 million sending domains, 84% have no DMARC record at all One of those is mine (I have SPF records but no DKIM or DMARC). I don't seem to have any issues. I'm not a "bulk sender&quot
294.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
I'm sorry but what the f is that timeline? (Condensed to relevant notifications:) 2025-05-01 - Vulnerability submitted to security@exim.org 2026-05-08 - Exim maintainers notified the Distros 2026-05-10 - Restricted Access is p
295.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
"works fine" and "has some compatibility problems" is a little bit of an oxymoron... I understand what you're trying to say, but that does mean it's essentially unusable , despite "working fine".
296.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
What are you actually trying to say with these links?
297.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
?
298.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
You're right in that I should really be able to back my position up better. I don't know if/when a situation where I have to deal with the systemd network components will come up though :/
299.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
Running on 127.0.0.53 isn't a systemd-resolved exclusive magic trick, you can just configure unbound to do the same thing.
300.
by eqvinox 5mo ago
> Can you give some more details, or do you have some examples of where systemd is bad here? I can't, because it's death by a thousand cuts. I remember systemd-timesyncd having security issues, but not what exactly. systemd-r

More ›