eppp

23 ms·

91.
by eppp 3y ago
Isn't this just portland cement at that point?
92.
by eppp 3y ago
We are also in need of sand for concrete. Can we not crush the rock until suitable for concrete and then entomb it in buildings and structures?
93.
by eppp 3y ago
Why would a bill be a problem? Is this not about upfront advertising?
94.
by eppp 3y ago
The taxes and fees change all the time. As an ISP you have no control over what the government fees are going to be. How can you list a price up front when you are at the mercy of the people making up these rules?
95.
by eppp 3y ago
I cant even guarantee you we can build in any given building even if a resident wants the service. Cell providers don't have to deal with physical issues of access.
96.
by eppp 3y ago
How would that work when you may not even know where the person wants service? You might know a general area and there might be unknown fees that the isp cant know until after they negotiate with the various stakeholders to build service.
97.
by eppp 3y ago
What fraud prevention and innovation? They don't investigate anything. My card has been stolen or skimmed 3 times in 2 years. They just write it off and send me a new one. How many billions a year are these two companies foisting on us
98.
by eppp 3y ago
I dont see that option when I ssh to a machine. If you want better defaults then offer them. I was being deliberately obtuse but barely.
99.
by eppp 3y ago
If only we could use something to transport large amounts of liquids long distances.
100.
by eppp 3y ago
There is a lot of desert where desalination is typically used. Seems like putting problematic water soluble in places where the main problem is lack of water would work out ok. Unless they are also blown around by wind in some problematic w
101.
by eppp 3y ago
Arent water rights mostly a federal issue at this point?
102.
by eppp 3y ago
When I ssh to a device it asks me for a user name and password. Thats probably why.
103.
by eppp 3y ago
I would imagine that its someone who builds a profitable offering on the back of OSS and doesn't give back anything.
104.
by eppp 3y ago
Munis will almost always beat any other electric provider including rural coops because their customer per mile is a multiple of a rural operator. It ends up making the coops look terrible because we have to cut an order of magnitude more v
105.
by eppp 3y ago
You also receive goods that are subsidized by the use of those roads.
106.
by eppp 3y ago
If I recall, the FAA recently approved unleaded for that use.
107.
by eppp 3y ago
I am not writing socket code. I am trying to get residential customers to the websites they would like to visit. Maybe it wouldn't have made it any better to expand the header and change the version but then again maybe it would have.
108.
by eppp 3y ago
That is a pretty simplistic way of looking at it. If it worked the same then why do I have to duplicate all layers of the stack to make it work? And even if I did, I still have to maintain the ipv4 stuff functionally forever. That's wh
109.
by eppp 3y ago
I just got approved to buy another /20 at $40 each. I am sure Amazon is buying them and putting them on AWS stuff as well.
110.
by eppp 3y ago
No its the fault of the architectural astronauts that decided to reinvent the whole thing instead of slowly phasing in the changes needed to add more addresses.
111.
by eppp 3y ago
There are still massive amounts of consumer grade equipment that have no ability to deal with ipv6 addresses. How much modern iot stuff even supports it?
112.
by eppp 3y ago
It didnt 20 years ago. That spec could have been changed and on routers added a default padding for the devices that didn't understand the new variable length. 0.0.0.0.192.168.0.1 or whatever for the legacy ipv4 devices. Im sure there
113.
by eppp 3y ago
It is still cheaper on a 10y timeframe to buy ipv4 than it is to pay for a NAT box for ipv4 and to deploy ipv6 and run both.
114.
by eppp 3y ago
I know that. But it doesn't solve the problem of people needing to continue buying ipv4 to serve new customers.
115.
by eppp 3y ago
ISPs have ipv4 because our customers want to get to sites that are ipv4 only. We can't just tell them "oops we dont support ipv4 sites anymore" The fix the content side and the isps will migrate.
116.
by eppp 3y ago
No, we keep being required to have ipv4 so our customers can reach the sites they are trying to get to. If it was just as simple as deploying ipv6 and retiring ipv4 we would have done it already. But someone just had to make them not intero
117.
by eppp 3y ago
And yet I bet you still have an ipv4 address too and half your things attached to your wifi dont support ipv6.
118.
by eppp 3y ago
Don't they show this with the blue coloration in the oil?
119.
by eppp 3y ago
Which leaves what exactly?
120.
by eppp 3y ago
Its changing who is doing it, not so much ending it. It will wipe out what is left of the small midwest towns though when it all consolidates.

More ›