eoo

5 ms·

1.
by eoo 5y ago
Bitcoin is as obsolete as POSIX. It's ossified, and not changing is a feature.
2.
by eoo 5y ago
- Why is KyuWeb limited to HTTP/1.1? - This might be a silly question, but could you explain to me why did you pick a new header, instead of something like `Accept: text/kyu`?
3.
by eoo 5y ago
Regarding the distribution of users on Mastodon servers, the article seems a little biased. The author complains about how "an average of six hundred users per server" doesn't look like "every user knows the system admin
4.
by eoo 5y ago
Needs cost-based querying paid for with lightning network to be viable at scale.
5.
by eoo 5y ago
AFAIK Digital Ocean blocks outbound connections to port 25. Has the author actually tried this setup? Source: https://docs.digitalocean.com/support/why-is-smtp-blocked/
6.
by eoo 5y ago
I heard that truffle is a little outdated unfortunately, and doesn't add much value nowadays over hardhat.
7.
by eoo 5y ago
Breaking down Google is not gonna work. I guess that the simplest solution is to forbid Google from being in the ad exchange business. Take down AdX and most of the monopolizing effects they have on the ecosystem would be dampened.
8.
by eoo 5y ago
I think this will potentially be the lawsuit of the year. Really interesting read. A lot of the monopoly advantages seem to focus on AdX. I wonder if demanding that Google shall not participate in the ad exchange business could slowly open
9.
by eoo 5y ago
An NFT is a virtual title of ownership on a blockchain, that's it. You don't own neither a string or an image or a JSON. https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721
10.
by eoo 5y ago
1. I'm not sure we agree on that... Bitcoin doesn't protect against attacks, it provides you with a relatively simple model to measure the cost of attacks. At equilibrium, any Bitcoin network participant will look for two fundame
11.
by eoo 5y ago
1. My point is that you lost me here: > This immediately produces an incentive for both the network to make use of as much computational capacity as possible to keep itself safe, and for any attacker to amass enough computational capacit
12.
by eoo 5y ago
There's a non-sequitour in your depiction of an attack. Gaining 50% of hashing power is not that interesting unless you really want to prevent someone from using their Bitcoin. And you can only prevent them from using it while your att
13.
by eoo 5y ago
I understand how mRNA works. I've got a background in both Chem and CompSci and I read https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/reverse-engineering-source... But I wouldn't use it for the same reason I don&#x27
14.
by eoo 5y ago
Yep, this is just the introduction to these kinds of thing. Then, they start to get accountants in both countries to agree on what seems a reasonable rate, say 30%? And the other 70% can be delayed earnings or whatever, and then maybe they
15.
by eoo 6y ago
I met aome of the creators back in the day. The RedHat model is working well for them: open source and sell consultancy. It doesn't scale exponentially but as long as their OSS product is good they won't have a shortage of incomin
16.
by eoo 6y ago
Assuming some market efficiency, those fees should be fairly similar to the cost to process that transaction into a block, so, 2,000 usd
17.
by eoo 6y ago
It's a pretty long article
18.
by eoo 6y ago
It's not about being close to consumers. 1. If you are the Communist party and you are planning electricity for a 5M inhabitants city in 2007, growing at 9% (doubling every ~7 years, electricity use is highly correlated with economic g
19.
by eoo 6y ago
I think it's really similar to art. It's more about your relationship with the artist or the emotion that makes you want to own the original... And of course, the art market.
20.
by eoo 6y ago
TL;DR: Ethereum uses a lot of energy, we shouldn't use it for anything non essential because it wastes energy. Contrary to the article title, 90% of the arguments exposed are just rehashing why energy waste os bad, and why we shouldn&#